Monday, March 25, 2013

Sydney's West waits its chance

Vanguard April 2013 p. 4
David B.


Murdoch’s Telegraph and The Australian scream it from their headlines.

 Alan Jones, Steve Price and Ray Hadley scream it over the airwaves.

“Sydney’s Western Suburbs hate Labor!”

 Hate the sight of them. Hate the sound of them. Hate the very thought of them.

It’s almost in the air we breathe.

It’s a real dilemma for us all let alone a Labor leader trying to woo them to vote for the local hack.


Sydney’s Western Suburbs are the home of Keating’s true believers. They have been loyal for generations. They expected and aspired and to an extent prospered.

Their loyalty and belief has been dashed as the reality of the Obeid’s, the Williamson’s, the MacDonald’s heaped injury and insult on the abuses so many Westies had previously turned a blind eye to.

Used and betrayed

In NSW, Labor stands as little more than a training house for those seeking the life of Riley. Inside it they squabble amongst themselves for each opportunity to feast on the plums of office in a betrayal of those they ask to put them there. Some are not so crass but in the sum this is their way.

The cloak of idealistic endeavour, of serving those suffering hardship and deprivation stands exposed as a sham.


The crisis on the roads, unreliability of the trains, hospital waiting lists, price gouging by state electricity and water instrumentalities, open slather for developers in the suburbs, neglect of government schools, the handovers of public land and taxing local bowling and small clubs out of existence, have all burdened the West.

They know they have been used and betrayed, and as a scorned lover turns blindly vengeful, Westies await their opportunity to give Labor its comeuppance in spades.


 



Impotence in the parliamentary arena


But it’s not so much being spurned, it’s Westies’ impotence in the world of power, where state power and money power meld into a parasitic beast of such potency that the millions in Sydney’s West count for next to naught.

The real issues in Sydney’s West are power and capitalism.

The power of capitalism, and its vile henchmen (and they are mostly men) in the parliamentary arena in all their exposed parasitic greed, disenfranchising the people from their own suburbia.

The complete impotence of the working class in suburbia and society, with Labor hacks using the West as their ticket to the lifestyles of the rich and famous, and their combination with the bankers and mining giants against the mortgage belt, has come to this denouement.

The workers hate their impotence. That is what this is about.

They know in their bones capital rules supreme but they have been told time and again “We’ll look after you” by the now exposed quislings of Labor.
 

Capitalist power flaunted

The aspirationals and battlers of the West strive to get some improvements in their lives and for their kids. For ever tiny advance they have achieved, they watch the bankers and mining monopolies enrich themselves at an astounding rate. Big money, the monopolies of every sort, mining companies, real estate developers, financiers, chemical monopolies, transport moguls, supermarket retail conglomerates, and gas companies all run rampant over society and over the West.

The monopolies rub our noses in their exercise of power, their day-to-day control of state power in our communities, our states and territories and the nation.

Bribery and corruption of parliamentary elites is merely a sideshow to the main game of capitalism.

See how quickly all the issues of law, regulation and environmental controls have been cleared from the path of coal-seam gas companies.

Contrast that with endless squabbling, erection of barriers or inaction over fixing the health and education systems or congestion on the cities roads.

Power and impotence is the issue.


Our impotence and their power. 

Workers have real power beyond parliament

According to the “rules” of the capitalist game, there is only one power in Westies’ hands, their vote. And they intend to use it, even if it hurts.

It may not be the right approach. It is certainly not the best approach, but until they know another one it will do for now.

Many know Abbott will hit them. They are not fooled by his gloating observation that the Western suburbs are the “new heartland of the Liberal Party”. They know he’s from the North Shore. A boy from a top private school. A trusted confidante of big business. That’s not news to them. They are not as silly as the shock jocks would have people believe.

But their current focus is on getting back at those who have ignored them in the pursuit of self-interest and power through corruption.

They yearn to exercise the one “power” granted to them by the system and that’s their vote.

Class consciousness in the Western suburbs is a product of spontaneity and is still to be developed into a scientific ideology. The West is cosmopolitan, ethnically, and in its experience. It is aware of itself as a class but not yet aware enough and organized enough to act for itself as a class.

Over time, that higher class consciousness is bound to develop. Capitalism and the class struggle will make such a development inevitable.


The task of Communists is to work patiently amongst the people, starting always from the spontaneous reaction of the people to their own impotence and to the power of the class that rules over them in society.

Rather than obsess about whether or not the Western suburbs vote for Gillard or Abbott, our task is to take the discussion beyond the bounds of parliamentarism, to gradually raise the class consciousness of the Westies and of working people around the nation to the real power they have in workplace and community organization.

It is to win them to confidence in an agenda for fundamental social change that can be kept independent of, and advanced outside of, the parliamentary channels.

There is fertile ground everywhere for comrades who are prepared to go into the community and amongst all with whom they work, who can overcome the “left bloc” and really implement the mass line style of political work.


Quick! Get the surface spray

Vanguard April 2013 p.4
Jack D.


It looks like the ALP hierarchy has just now woken up to the fact they have largely ‘missed the boat’.

Tony Sheldon, National Secretary of the Transport Workers Union and National Vice-President of the ALP, has taken a swing at some of his party’s misdeeds and some wrong-doers. He said, "Like cockroaches, B-grade politicians are able to thrive on the corruption and detritus that lies under the dishwasher." He also said, "It's a crisis of belief brought on by a lack of moral and political purpose."

On his first point what does he want? Perhaps a 200 litre drum of the most potent of surface spray may do the trick. It is the only thing that might fix it. Simply changing leaders like musical chairs will achieve nothing. In fact, that is basically what has been going on for many decades as older working people will know.

Tony Sheldon is right on the button when he said, "It's a crisis of belief brought on by a lack of moral and political purpose." The ALP is not a real working class party, a party of the working-class. It never was and never can be. It is a social democrat bourgeois party, imbued with that ideology and confined to always work within the limitations set by capitalism.

It does not lack political purpose. It serves the purpose that is set by and for those with the cold stony, rusty heart of the capitalist class. That purpose is to mislead and divert working-class struggle into areas harmless to capital as that class intensifies its profit maximization schemes, its exploitation of the workers.

Study the tides

It is a purpose the ALP have become most efficient at; after all, there has been no fundamental change in the exploitation of the working class since the advent of the ALP. This is because it has been tied in to capital all of its existence. It is tied to capital more so today than ever before. It is therefore unreasonable to expect anything more from it as it is not a revolutionary party and essentially it serves the interests of capital, not the working class.

To rely on the likes of the ALP and on the parliamentary system to bring about fundamental change in the relationships of production is about as much use as standing on the sea shore piddling into the ocean trying to stop the tide from going out! I know. I tried both. It doesn’t work, it is asking the impossible.

 

Chicken processor plucked by US capitalists

Vanguard April 2013 p. 5
Nick G.


US capital has secured yet another Australian-owned company, chicken processor Ingham Enterprises.

This ends 95 years of family ownership of the company.

It is not our intention to weep for the capitalist Ingham family.  They have engaged in the private appropriation of surplus value created by generations of workers simply because the ownership system of capitalism gives them that right.

But the company has now been purchased by US investors and profits realised through the sale of Ingham’s products will be directed to the hands of US billionaires. An extra squeeze will be on the agenda for Ingham workers to force an increase in those profits.

Corporate piranhas

In this case, the foreign investor is one of the global capital’s most ruthless private equity firms, Texas-based TPG Capital.  Its sole interest in an acquired company is to buy out current owners and shareholders, strip it of non-core assets, redirect its operations only to high return ventures and then sell the company at a huge profit through a public share offering. 

Sometimes it will purchase the same company and start the whole process over again in what the International Union of Food workers (IUF) calls a “Buy ‘em, bleed ‘em, buy ‘em again cheap” strategy.

For example, in 2000, TPG and Leonard Green & Partners invested $200 million to acquire Petco, the US  pet supplies retailer as part of a $600 million buyout. Within two years they sold most of it in a public offering that valued the company at $1 billion. Petco’s market value more than doubled by the end of 2004 and the firms would ultimately realize a gain of $1.2 billion. Then, in 2006, the private equity firms took Petco private again for $1.68 billion.

Private equity goes for workers’ jugular

In all of this buying and selling frenzy, workers’ rights are the first to go.

At the time of its acquisition by TPG in 2002, Swissair caterer Gate Gourmet employed 25,000 workers. TPG immediately launched an aggressive drive for steep reductions in payrolls, wages and benefits involving closures and assaults on union rights. According to a Reuters report, the company today employs "about" 20,000 people.

In 2002, along with Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs Capital Group, TPG took over Burger King in a $2.3 billion leveraged buyout.  In December 2007, Burger King, the world's second largest restaurant chain (over 11,200 units in 65 countries), adamantly opposed an agreement which would see Florida farm workers receive a tiny one extra US cent for every pound of tomatoes purchased by the fast food giant.

Workers - not national bourgeoisie – will take up the fight

Company owner – now former owner - Bob Ingham exemplifies the weakness of the national bourgeoisie.  He has compliantly welcomed TPG’s buyout of his enterprise and expressed his confidence that TPG would “ensure that our customers will continue to receive the highest level of service and our employees would be well looked after”.

TPG has grabbed hold of Ingham at a time of expansion in the chicken processing industry.  Chicken meat production in South Australia, where Baiada and Ingham both have major processing plants, has doubled from $232m to $436m in the five years to 2011.

But it has also taken over following some major fightbacks by workers in the industry, particularly in rival Baiada owned plants.

The lessons of those struggles are sure to be shared with and taken up by Ingham workers at the first sign of intensified exploitation by their new foreign masters.

Baillieu shafted by nutters

Vanguard April 2013 p. 5
Bill F.


We all knew that the Victorian Liberal Premier, ‘do nothing’ Ted Baillieu, was in his political death throes, but were the fatal wounds from falling on his sword or from knives in his back?

Baillieu’s sudden resignation took place against a backdrop of murky events and disclosures.

There was the revelation of secretly recorded conversations between the state Liberal Party Director Damien Mantach, Premier Baillieu’s Chief of Staff Tony Nutt and disgraced former staffer Tristan Weston. Weston had been sacked after his role in the conspiracy to destabilise the former Labor-appointed Police Commissioner, Simon Overland, had been exposed.

Mantach and Nutt promised to look after Weston, offering him money, accommodation and help finding another job. Maybe they had good reason to keep him ‘gruntled’? Other sacked workers never get treated this way, and many don’t even get their legal entitlements.

When all this hit the fan, Baillieu flicked it to the newly formed Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Meanwhile Nutt had reassured Weston, an ex-cop, that the IBAC investigators would not include people from the old Office of Police Integrity who may have had prior dealings with him.

The other character, Damien Mantach, is still hanging on with vocal support from Tony Abbott. “I know Damien Mantach well. He is a person of integrity. So let’s see where this investigation goes. He has my confidence.”

Finally, the erratic right-wing backbencher Geoff Shaw, himself already under investigation for alleged rorts, resigned from the Liberal Party with stage-managed drama, triggering another crisis.

With all this going on, Baillieu, whether pushed or he jumped, was sidelined, and the ‘safe’ seat-warmer Denis Napthine was resurrected to become Premier. That is, at least until the federal election makes Tony Abbott the next Prime Minister.

What a stew! Who made the secret recordings? Who spilt the beans? Who benefitted?

This rubbish is ‘business as usual’ in Australian parliamentary politics. No wonder people are cynical – they are kept in the dark like mushrooms, disempowered by ‘fat cats’ who can pay $10,000 to have private dinners with government ministers, and manipulated by media moguls singing the hymns of ‘free trade’, foreign investment, and the need to cut wages and conditions to compete in the globalised market!

Recession whacks Victorian working people

Vanguard April 2013
Bill F.


Another backdrop to the Baillieu shafting was the release of Bureau of Statistics data which shows that the state of Victoria had moved into recession in the second half of 2012.

In brief, general spending fell by 1.1%, investment by 5%, retail sales by 0.8% and 11,000 jobs were lost.

Household spending on furniture and appliances dipped by 6% over three quarters, spending on gas and electricity slumped by 2-3% in spite of price hikes by the privatised utility companies, and restaurant, hotel and café spending has fallen by 5%.

Before the global economic crisis of 2008, there was a steady 4% growth in household spending in Victoria, but last year the growth was only 1.3%, less than the population growth rate, and still falling.

 Hard times

The only sales growth recorded was for new cars (cheaper imports?) and mobile phones, and the latest electronic gadgets that all kids (and others) have to have.

Behind these statistics is the grim reality of Victorian working people doing it tough. They are cutting back heavily on so-called ‘discretionary spending’; making do with clapped out appliances and tattered furniture, missing out on films and entertainment and meals in restaurants, putting off trips and holidays, and spending less on new clothes.

This is because the money is needed for the basic things such as rent/mortgage, council rates, food, healthcare, education, and transport costs for work, all of which continue to cost more every year.

Those already unemployed (5.2% in Victoria) and those in the manufacturing, hospitality and retail sectors in shaky jobs or on short hours, temporary or casual work, are the first to feel the pinch.

The slump in investment is also starting to alarm the local capitalist class. They see investment capital by-passing Victoria and being sucked into mining and speculation. While they don’t give a hoot for the struggles of working people, they do want paying customers for their products and services. Employer groups are now calling for some easing of the ‘balanced budget’ mantra and a little Keynesian pump-priming by the state government! 

Class struggle and the state apparatus

Vanguard April 2013 p. 6
by Alice M.



In their detailed analysis of classes and class struggle Marx, Engels and Lenin paid a great deal of attention to the decisive role of the coercive state apparatus in enforcing the rule of the class that holds the economic and political power in society.

Their investigations into the historical origins of classes and class struggle showed that the state apparatus arose at the time when human society divided into two main classes – the exploited and oppressed majority who create all the wealth (surplus value) in society, and a small minority who own the means of production, exploit the vast majority and keep the surplus value for their own class.

The job of the capitalist state machine is to suppress the resistance and struggles of the working class, and ensure that the exploitation by the minority class is not interfered with or disturbed by the majority working class of the exploited population. In his 1919 lecture on The State, Lenin said, “The state is a machine for maintaining the rule of one class over another.”

Today’s monopoly capitalist state is made up of the armed forces (army and police), jails, the public services, the courts, the extensive legal system and the mass media. The capitalist state is administered by parliament, the CEO (Chief Executive Office) for the ruling class.

Ted Hill, the founding Chairperson of the CPA (M-L) used these general truths of the coercive state machine exposed by Marx, Engels and Lenin, to examine the particularities and characteristics of Australia’s imperialist dominated capitalist state. His analysis deepened the revolutionary working class consciousness and advanced Australia’s revolutionary theory.
 
 

Marx, Engels, Lenin and Hill pointed out that the state apparatus takes many different forms, reflecting the historical, economic and social conditions of the time. The capitalist state uses both the open force and the deception as a means to suppress resistance and challenge to the main order of the capitalist class rule. Both the open and the deceptive coercion of the capitalist state are two sides of the same coin, often used simultaneously.

There’s the open violence and suppression by the armed forces – the army and the police, including the secret police, and imprisonment of rebellious workers. There’s also the coercive state machinery of the upper levels of the public service and the bourgeois legal system that administers and enforces the capitalist class exploitation.

The monopoly media is an essential part of this capitalist state’s superstructure. It vigorously imposes the ideology and interests of the monopoly capitalist class, and tries to crush or silence the voice and the will of the people when resistance and rebellion of the working class disturbs the smooth operations of the capitalist exploitation.

The imperialist dominated capitalist state has always used both of these forms of state repression and coercion.

From the British colonial armed forces’ bloody and violent repression of the Aboriginal people, the violent putting down of rebellious convicts, the Eureka uprising of 1854, the struggles of shearers and maritime workers in the early 1890s, to the Chifley Labor government using the army to crush the striking coal miners in 1949.

More recently we have seen the 1998 MUA struggle, police attacking striking workers on the picket lines, the secretive Commonwealth Crimes Act and the more deceptive, but no less effective, suppression of working class struggles through the capitalist legal system in the form of the penal powers in the 1950s and 1960s, the BIIC, the ABCC, WorkChoices, Fair Work Australia and  many thousands more anti-worker laws designed to paralyse working class struggle and gut workers’ collective organisation. 

In the struggle between construction unions and the giant Grollo construction company in November 2012 the state deployed most instruments of the state machinery to suppress construction workers’ battle for safety in their workplace. More than one thousand armed and riot police were dispatched to the peaceful picket line.

Simultaneously, the capitalist state activated many of its anti-worker laws against the union and workers, and the capitalist mass media went into full drive spreading lies and propaganda to discredit and demonise the just fight of construction workers.

In Australia’s present conditions, the capitalist state can largely rely on coercion by deception, through its legal system and the mass media, in the suppression of the exploited working class.   

Nevertheless, in spite of the coercive state machinery surrounding the working class, all the improvements to workers rights and conditions had been wrung out of the capitalist class through workers own struggles. They are important concessions forced on the ruling class by the organised and militant actions of the working class.

Through these actions the working class deepens the understanding of class struggle, the capitalist system and the role of its coercive state.

We encourage activists to study – Engels’ Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State,  Lenin’s lecture on The State  and The State and Revolution, as well as Ted Hill’s Revolution and the Australian State.

ASIO bloats. Rights shrink. Fightback sharpens

Vanguard April 2013 p. 6
Dennis M.

ASIO parades itself as our shield against terrorists. Yet ASIO is itself part of a terrorist network. It is one branch of the state terrorism run on behalf of global corporates.

That is nothing new. Forty years ago, Attorney-General Murphy visited ASIO’s Melbourne headquarters. He had ASIO in his portfolio but it was not under his control.

Murphy feared for the safety of the Yugoslav prime minister who was due to visit. ASIO had been shielding the Croatian terrorist organisation, the Utashi. These fascists also trained with the Australian Army. Utashi fighters infiltrated Yugoslavia to terrorise the population.

A second instance of ASIO terrorism was the Hilton bombing.

ASIO framed Tim Anderson but that ‘conviction’ fell apart.

Mossad agents

ASIO sub-contracts for global terrorist organisations. It is the regional partner for the CIA, MI6 and Mossad. Spy agencies help each other with official documents. In February 2010, Dubai police revealed that Mossad terrorists had used Australian passports in the murder of a Hamas leader. Mossad nobbled their agent Ben Zygier before he could go public.

Big Brothers

From 1996 to 2005 Dennis Richardson was Director-General of ASIO.  Then he went to Washington as Ambassador. He came back to head Foreign Affairs. Now he heads Defence. Richardson has not held four different jobs.  His career is merely a division of labour for a spook.

ASIO’s current head is David Irvine. He sounds like O’Brien from Nineteen Eighty Four. His every word comes across as a threat: ‘How dare you question our motives or actions.’ 

New ASIO Central Office

ASIO’s new HQ is being built in Canberra beside the Defence Department. The Defence offices encircle the US eagle on a 50m. high column. That totem pole exposes whose interests are being defended. Spy bases, the Marine base in Darwin, and drones out of Katherine enforce the rule of US monopoly capital. More than ever, the Defence Department is a sub-branch of the US war machine.

ASIO now has 1,800 agents. That is three times as many spooks as during the peak of the Cold War. They will operate around the clock.

In 2009, ASIO got total exemption from the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.  There is one law for ASIO and another law for the rest of us.

To work on the site a navvy needs a security clearance. Those clearances are readily available to holders of 457 visas. Union officials are often denied entry.

Meanwhile, the lead contractor is a convicted criminal. In April last year, Lend Lease paid fines and restitution of $US54m. For ten years, it had engaged in what a US judge called ‘a systematic pattern of audacious fraud’.  Militant workers are barred. A criminal corporation is put in charge. Once again, there is one law for ASIO and another law for the rest of us.

The ASIO website encourages us to report threats to our security. ASIO is a clear and present danger. To whom can we report ASIO? The answer is to our fellow Australians.

 ASIO powers have ballooned. Independence fighters need a sharp policy.

Our demands remain those of the Committee for the Abolition of the Political Police.
 
Do away with ASIO! Destroy all security files!