Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Albanese to weaken environment laws for foreign salmon farmers

 Written by: Nick G. on 6 March 2025

 

(Above: Salmon farms off Bruny Island.   Source: Environmental Defenders Office)

In a move that caught environmentalists by surprise, PM Albanese has intervened in a controversy over salmon farming in western Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour by promising to weaken environmental laws to guarantee the future of the industry. Albanese wrote to industry owners in February promising to “introduce legislation to ensure appropriate environmental laws are in place to continue sustainable salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour”.

Last November, Albanese injected a further $28 million into the industry to improve oxygenation levels in the harbour following a request by conservation groups to Environment Minister Plibersek to reassess salmon farming approvals under the Environmental Protection and biodiversity Conservation Act.

Their concern was the future of the endangered Maugean skate – a stingray-like creature whose only known habitat is in the harbour. Studies had shown its numbers were falling due to low oxygen levels in harbour waters caused by the salmon pens. Another $9 million of federal funds is to assist a skate captive breeding program. This money too, should come from the companies threatening the skates’ existence.

Albanese’s intervention has effectively sunk the expected decision by Plibersek’s department to raise the skate’s threatened species level from endangered to critically endangered. Their decision has been postponed until after the federal election.

Public concern over the nature of salmon farming

Concerns over salmon farming – the raising and harvesting of fish from large pens located in open sea water – are as old as the salmon farms, but the publication in 2021 by Penguin Books of respected novelist Richard Flanagan’s Toxic – The Rotting Underbelly of the Tasmanian Salmon Industry gave opponents of the farms the ammunition they needed for a widespread campaign. Some people claimed that Flanagan’s devastating exposé of the industry, with its destructive practices, diseases and fish kills, and use of synthetic chemicals to dye the fish flesh, had put them off eating salmon forever.

The main problem with salmon pens is that they let fish faeces and food waste fall directly onto the ocean floor where the build-up of excess nutrients can destroy marine ecosystems. It can lead to harmful algal blooms that reduce oxygen levels in the water killing fish on the pens and marine life in adjacent waters. Diseases associated with fish in poor health are then treated with hundreds of kilograms of antibiotics which leach into surrounding waters. There they are taken in by wild fish above the allowable level for human consumption. Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for particular fish diseases, rather than safer vaccines, could lead to antimicrobial resistance beyond the target bacteria. Despite these problems, the Tasmanian government is proposing to increase the area of permitted significant environmental impacts on sea floors under salmon farms from the current 35 metres by an extra 100 metres of legally permitted pollution.

Driven by profits and returns to overseas shareholders, the 3 foreign companies in the industry have been allowed to self-report to the Tasmanian Environmental Protection Authority and have concealed reports on nutrients, fish deaths and fish escapes, diseases and antibiotics. Lack of transparency, of secrecy, is a matter of great concern to Tasmanians.

Multinationals served by government

Tasmanian salmon farming is entirely in the hands of three foreign multinationals. They are Tassal, owned by Canadian company Cooke Inc, since 2022; Huon Aquaculture, owned by notorious Brazilian meat processors JBS, since November 2021; and Petuna Seafoods, 50% owned by Maori nations and 50% by Japanese Nissui.

According to Tax Office data, the companies have paid no tax since 2019.

However, both the Tasmanian and federal governments are bending over backwards to ensure these foreign companies are not placed on an endangered list. From reworking and weakening environmental protection laws, to injecting public funds to save these private companies to have to clean up their own mess, to hiding all of this under a professed concern for jobs – it all comes down to governments in open service to capitalism.

The industry has claimed greater numbers of jobs than really exist. The Australia Institute has criticised the figures based on census data and has been supported by Tasmanian Senator Jaqui Lambi who described industry figures as “bullshit” saying that “It’s all robotics. It’s just feed. They carry on. They overestimate.”

And on the other side of Tasmania…

Just three days after Albanese’s letter of support for the Macquarie Harbour fish farmers, the companies kicked an amazing own goal in south-eastern waters between Bruny Island and regions south of Hobart.

On February 20, masses of salmon carcasses and globules of rotted fish fat washed up on the southern beaches. This was despite large quantities of dead fish taken from pens and dumped in landfill east of Hobart.

Alistair Allan, Greens candidate for Lyons in the forthcoming federal election said, “This is now solid proof that the industry has completely lost control of the disease outbreak that is causing so much death and suffering on these factory fish farms.”

Jacqui Lambie, characteristically, says that she has had a gutful of the salmon industry, and said it must stop its Macquarie Harbour operations and either move further out to sea and transfer to land-based tanks, with the federal funding better spent on supporting the deployment of affected workers.

“You’ve made more than enough money off the arse of Tasmania. Move it on,” she said.

Postscript: Prize Catch

Capitalism’s destructive war on nature, its profit-driven disregard for the environment, its secrecy and corruption were brilliantly captured last year in Alan Carter’s novel Prize Catch, published by Fremantle Press. Needing to facilitate a takeover by a foreign company, a Bruny Island salmon farmer employs SAS war criminals blooded in Afghanistan (under the control of a very Ben Roberts-Smith type leader) to undertake a campaign of murder and intimidation of local environmentalists. Police corruption assists their endeavours. It’s as good as Australian crime fiction gets.

Book Review: Culture and Imperialism

Written by: Duncan B. on 5 March 2025

 

Culture and Imperialism is a 2024 reprint of a 1993 book by the Palestinian-born literary critic Edward Said.

In this book Said examines the domination by British, French and US imperialism over most of Africa, Asia, and South America, and the resistance to imperialism by the peoples of the countries invaded by imperialism. He does this by examining the culture, in particular the literature of the imperialist countries and of the subject countries.

Marx pointed out in his Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, “In the social production of their existence, men enter into definite, necessary relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production corresponding to a determinate stage of development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation on which there arises a legal and political superstructure and to which there correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political and intellectual life-process in general.” Culture is a part of the superstructure erected on the economic base, in this case of imperialism. 

In looking at the culture of the imperialist countries, Said examines novels by Jane Austen, Joseph Conrad, E M Forster, Rudyard Kipling, Albert Camus and others. He also discusses Verdi’s opera Aida. Said shows how these works helped to justify imperialism and make it normal and acceptable to the home audiences in the imperialist countries.

Kipling’s stories and poems in particular, glorified imperialism and denigrated the native peoples of the colonised countries with racist stereotypes. His poem The White Man’s Burden urged the imperialist powers to take more territory from its rightful owners.

In looking at the culture of the countries oppressed by imperialism, Said shows how books such as Franz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, and the writings of many other Arab, African and Asian writers helped oppressed peoples to raise their self-awareness of their oppressed position, reclaim their national cultures which were dominated by imperialist culture and to mobilise for anti-imperialist resistance and struggle. 

Said points out the world-wide spread of US culture, and the stranglehold that US media companies have over the supply of news in the world. This situation is much worse now than when Culture and Imperialism was written, thanks to the spread of social media. US culture dominates our TV shows, streaming services and live and recorded music.

Streaming service Stan, owned by channel 9, commissioned almost half of the new Australian-scripted content in 2024. The federal government had promised to impose local content quotas on the streaming services such as Netflix and Disney by July 1st last year. Hollywood resisted this, claiming that any regulation would be a breach of the Australia - US Free Trade Agreement. The government let this deadline pass.

Now the Trump government has threatened retaliation against countries which attempt to regulate the activities of US companies in their markets, claiming that this a violation of American sovereignty. It is likely that moves towards quotas will remain in limbo for the time being.

Australian culture has a proud history. There have been many writers, poets, artists and musicians who have played a strong role in the struggle for socialism and against capitalism and imperialism.  Australians must uphold their struggle and continue the fight against imperialism’s attempts to dominate our culture. 

Culture and Imperialism is not an easy book to read or to comprehend. It is well worth persevering with it however, to help us gain a better understanding of the important role which culture plays in anti-imperialist struggle.

 

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

ICOR strongly condemns the invasion of Congo by Rwandan troops and the blockade of the city of Goma

Written by: ICOR on 5 March 2025

 

The attack of the Rwandan special forces on the city of Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo was only possible with the support of highly developed equipment supplied by Western powers. The current situation in Eastern Congo is once again leading the region into an unprecedented cycle of violence.

The Congolese masses are caught in a vise and their situation is becoming increasingly untenable. From 25 December 2024, Goma and its population of over one million people has been added to the hundreds of thousands already wandering around in the jungles of the surrounding localities, fleeing bombings and insults from all sides. All supply routes for essential goods have been cut, including the city's water and electricity supply, which is now cut off from the outside world.
 
The destabilization of Congo, which has been going on for 65 years, is in line with the logic of imperialist exploitation and domination, with destabilization being a means to ensure the orderly plundering of Congo's natural resources. Millions of people were killed and millions more displaced. And Rwanda is playing the role once ascribed to the brokers during the slave trade, namely to serve the imperialist conquest of the Congolese mines..
 
The Democratic Republic of Congo is rich in natural resources, including gold, copper, tin, uranium and minerals such as coltan, which is used in the production of tantalum for cell phones and computers. In 2016, Rwanda accounted for 50% of global tantalum production, with the majority coming from coltan mines seized in the Democratic Republic of Congo. 
(Above: street art protesting Apple'srole in exploiting African labour for coltan supplies)
 
China now owns most of the cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, having bought out the previous owners from the US, and also controls most of the copper and uranium mines. The Congolese army has protected the Chinese assets. 
 
The ICOR demands the immediate withdrawal of the Rwandan troops from the Democratic Republic of Congo.
 
The ICOR supports the resistance of the Congolese people against imperialist domination and its Rwandan accomplice.
 
The ICOR supports the right of the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo to own and control the natural resources of their country. 
 
The ICOR calls for solidarity with the progressive organizations in the Democratic Republic of Congo in order to strengthen the resistance of the Congolese people.
 
The ICOR calls on all its members to actively oppose the import of Rwandan minerals into the European Union and demands the revocation of the Memorandum of Understanding between the EU and Rwanda from 2024 on the import of “Rwandan” minerals into the EU.
 
The ICOR demands a ban on the sale of arms to Rwanda.
 
The ICOR calls on all revolutionary organizations in the Democratic Republic of Congo to intensify their struggle against imperialism and to take a stand for socialism - the true liberation of the Congolese people! 
 
Long live proletarian internationalism in the struggle for national liberation, democracy and socialism!
 
Status of the signatories 04.03.2025. Further signing possible. Current list of signatories at www.icor.info
1. ORC   Organisation Révolutionnaire du Congo (Revolutionary Organization of Congo), Democratic Republic of the Congo
2. CPK   Communist Party of Kenya
3. CPSA (ML)   Communist Party of South Africa (Marxist-Leninist)
4. PPDS   Parti Patriotique Démocratique Socialiste (Patriotic Democratic Socialist Party), Tunisia
5. SPB   Socialist Party of Bangladesh
6. NCP (Mashal)   Nepal Communist Party (Mashal)
7. RUFN   Revolutionary United Front of Nepal
8. CPA/ML   Communist Party of Australia (Marxist-Leninist)
9. Krasnyj Klin   Аб'яднання беларускіх камуністаў «Чырвоны Клін» (Association of Belarusian Communists «Red Wedge»), Belarus
10. БКП   Българска Комунистическа Партия (Bulgarian Communist Party)
11. PR-ByH   Partija Rada - ByH (Party of Labor - Bosnia and Herzegovina)
12. MLPD   Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany)
13. UPML   Union Prolétarienne Marxiste-Léniniste (Marxist-Leninist Proletarian Union), France
14. BP (NK-T)   Bolşevik Parti (Kuzey Kürdistan-Türkiye) (Bolshevik Party (North Kurdistan-Turkey))
15. KOL   Kommunistische Organisation Luxemburg (Communist Organization of Luxemburg)
16. RM   Rode Morgen (Red Dawn), Netherlands
17. UMLP   União Marxista-Leninista Portuguesa (Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Union)
18. RMP   Российская маоистская партия (Rossijskaya maoistskaya partiya) (Russian Maoist Party)
19. MLGS   Marxistisch-Leninistische Gruppe Schweiz (Marxist-Leninist Group of Switzerland)
20. TKP-ML   Türkiye Komünist Partisi – Marksist-Leninist (Communist Party of Turkey – Marxist-Leninist)
21. MLKP   Marksist Leninist Komünist Parti Türkiye / Kürdistan (Marxist Leninist Communist Party Turkey / Kurdistan)
22. KSRD   Koordinazionnyj Sowjet Rabotschewo Dvizhenija (Coordination Council of the Workers Class Movement), Ukraine
23. UMU   Union of Maoists of the Urals (Union of Maoists of the Urals), Russia
24. PCP (independiente)   Partido Comunista Paraguayo (independiente) (Paraguayan  Communist Party (independent))
25. PC (ML)   Partido Comunista (Marxista Leninista) (Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)), Dominican Republic
26. SUCI (C)   Socialist Unity Center of India (Communist)
27. Chinese Communists (MLM)   Chinese Communists (Marxist Leninist Maoist)

Monday, March 3, 2025

ICOR call for International Women's Day 2025

Written by: ICOR on 4 March 2025

 

International Women's Day on 8 March is inextricably linked with the history of socialist women. In 1910, at the Second International Socialist Women's Conference in Copenhagen, the communist Clara Zetkin launched the initiative to establish a Women's Day on which women would take to the streets for their rights and freedom. 

This day of struggle for women's equality called for women's suffrage, the right to vote, but also for the introduction of the eight-hour working day, adequate protection for mothers and children, the establishment of minimum wages and equal pay for an equal day's work – all of which were groundbreaking achievements for the masses of women. But the struggle could not be separated from the struggle against imperialist warmongering, which would determine the fate of the world only a few years later. 
 
Socialist women took a clear stand against the policies of the imperialist powers that led to the First World War. Rosa Luxemburg summed up the spirit of the times with the slogan “Socialism or Barbarism”. This warning has lost none of its relevance to this day: we are experiencing a new phase of imperialist wars and reactionary preparations for war, of the willful destruction of nature. On the contrary, the rapid developments of our time make the task of saving humankind and the environment from the destructive power of capitalist profit logic even more urgent.
 
The danger of a Third World War is currently greater than ever. The theaters of war in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as war preparations in the South China Sea and South America, are harbingers of that war. With his so-called peace negotiations with Putin and threats of forced deportation of Palestinians from Gaza, US president Trump sharpens his imperialist power plans on the backs of the peoples, as well as the rivalry with other powers. 
 
The aggression against the peoples of the region which are supported by the imperialists and the genocide of Israel's reactionary Zionist government towards the Palestinian people show the unprecedented contempt for humanity and the wanton destruction of the imperialist order. The Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria is also exposed to massive threats from the Turkish state; its revolutionary achievements and advances in the liberation of women must be defended. In the reactionary war in Sudan, which is being waged with the support of various imperialist powers, we experience women committing suicide on a massive scale to escape the sexual aggression of anti-people warmongers.
 
Today, too, it is the meaningful duty of all militant and socialist women worldwide to resist imperialist warmongering and oppose psychological war preparation and warfare which try to portray these wars as liberation, humanism and defense. Let us put a stop to this! We women will take to the streets on 8 March with a determined and militant anti-war stance!
 
The living conditions in today's world are particularly painful for women and children. This begins with the low income, lack of child care or, even more intensified in case of flight, hunger, poverty, hardship, violence, misery, also rape and other forms of sexualized violence.
 
Especially working-class women are suffering from ever-increasing unemployment, inflation and a wave of impoverishment. For example the workers in the gold mines of Mali, agricultural workers in Indonesia, the female industrial workers such as the VW workers in Germany who are confronted with threatening job cuts, and the militant trade-unionists in the Netherlands – they are all doubly exploited. Especially the children of the working  class are confronted with great insecurity and fear of the future.
 
All of this also challenges the fighting spirit of women all over the world. The new US president, too, must and will have to contend with all these women. When the ruling class doubly exploits working women, our conclusion can only be that we must be twice as determined fighting for the socialist revolution. The proletarian women's movement is the backbone of the worldwide militant women's movement. However, with this call, we address all women, all fighters for the liberation of women!
 
The deep crisis of the bourgeois system also means that patriarchal violence has taken on ever greater proportions. In recent years, brutal femicides in Mexico, Bangladesh, Turkey, India, Kenya and many other countries have led to large mass mobilizations. It is our duty to resist the oppression of women!
On 8 March, we also commemorate the Mirabal sisters, who as communist pioneers stood up against the dictatorship in the Dominican Republic and became a symbol in the fight against patriarchal violence. Today too, as women, together with our class alliance partners, we must fight in the front lines against the increasingly reactionary forms of imperialist capitalism and rising fascism. Trump, Modi, Milei, Orban, Erdogan, they all declare themselves enemies of women with their fascist ideology and behave as such!
 
All of these are already more than enough reasons to take to the streets on 8 March! We also declare: the oppression of women and their exploitation, in all its facets, are inherent in the capitalist system. In his groundbreaking work, “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”, Frederick Engels already laid the foundation for this conclusion with his historical-materialistic analysis of the gender relations. We can only achieve a solution through social revolution! Therefore, in the socialist tradition of 8 March, let us continue on the path of great pioneers such as Clara Zetkin, Inessa Armand, Rosa Luxemburg, Alexandra Kollontai, Nadezhda Krupskaya, and many others!
 
The revolutionary world organization ICOR is resolutely committed to the liberation of women, to the coordination and strengthening of their struggles, to the networking and exchange of their forces.
 
In close alliance with the worldwide movements for liberation, especially the grassroots women and revolutionary forces, ICOR calls for demonstrations on 8 March and advocates the slogans:
 
Women against imperialism and fascism!
The road to our liberation is through the struggle for socialism!
Working women, oppressed women of the world, forward in the struggle against im-perialism and for socialism!
 
Status of the signatories 02.03.2025. Further signing possible. Current list of signatories at www.icor.info:
1. ORC   Organisation Révolutionnaire du Congo (Revolutionary Organization of Congo), Democratic Republic of the Congo
2. CPK   Communist Party of Kenya
3. CPSA (ML)   Communist Party of South Africa (Marxist-Leninist)
4. PPDS   Parti Patriotique Démocratique Socialiste (Patriotic Democratic Socialist Party), Tunisia
5. SPB   Socialist Party of Bangladesh
6. NCP (Mashal)   Nepal Communist Party (Mashal)
7. RUFN   Revolutionary United Front of Nepal
8. CPA/ML   Communist Party of Australia (Marxist-Leninist)
9. Krasnyj Klin   Аб'яднання беларускіх камуністаў «Чырвоны Клін» (Association of Belarusian Communists «Red Wedge»), Belarus
10. БКП   Българска Комунистическа Партия (Bulgarian Communist Party)
11. PR-ByH   Partija Rada - ByH (Party of Labor - Bosnia and Herzegovina)
12. MLPD   Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany)
13. UPML   Union Prolétarienne Marxiste-Léniniste (Marxist-Leninist Proletarian Union), France
14. BP (NK-T)   Bolşevik Parti (Kuzey Kürdistan-Türkiye) (Bolshevik Party (North Kurdistan-Turkey))
15. KOL   Kommunistische Organisation Luxemburg (Communist Organization of Luxemburg)
16. RM   Rode Morgen (Red Dawn), Netherlands
17. UMLP   União Marxista-Leninista Portuguesa (Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Union)
18. RMP   Российская маоистская партия (Rossijskaya maoistskaya partiya) (Russian Maoist Party)
19. MLGS   Marxistisch-Leninistische Gruppe Schweiz (Marxist-Leninist Group of Switzerland)
20. TKP-ML   Türkiye Komünist Partisi – Marksist-Leninist (Communist Party of Turkey – Marxist-Leninist)
21. MLKP   Marksist Leninist Komünist Parti Türkiye / Kürdistan (Marxist Leninist Communist Party Turkey / Kurdistan)
22. KSRD   Koordinazionnyj Sowjet Rabotschewo Dvizhenija (Coordination Council of the Workers Class Movement), Ukraine
23. UMU   Union of Maoists of the Urals (Union of Maoists of the Urals), Russia
24. PCC-M   Partido Comunista de Colombia – Maoista (Communist Party of Colombia - Maoist)
25. PCP (independiente)   Partido Comunista Paraguayo (independiente) (Paraguayan  Communist Party (independent))
26. PC (ML)   Partido Comunista (Marxista Leninista) (Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)), Dominican Republic
27. SUCI (C)   Socialist Unity Center of India (Communist)
28. CPPDM   Chinese People's Party for the Defense of Mao Zedong
29. Chinese Communists (MLM)   Chinese Communists (Marxist Leninist Maoist)

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Lessons for Australia in Trump’s Ukraine switch

 Written by: Nick G. on 26 February 2025

 

(Source:   https://www.republicworld.com)

If ever any of the US bootlickers in Australian political and military circles needed a wake-up call, it has come directly from Trump’s change of US policy on Ukraine.

Trump has thrown Zelensky under a bus, demanded mineral and rare earth deposits worth 50% of Ukrainian GDP as “compensation” for its financing of Ukraine’s efforts to defeat Russian aggression, and set out to negotiate a deal for ending the war with Putin to the exclusion of the Ukrainians.

Then on February 24, to coincide with the third anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the UN General Assembly debated two resolutions on the conflict, one proposed by the US, and one by Ukraine.

The US resolution omitted mention of Russian aggression, and only passed after a majority of Member States voted to add EU-led amendments which led to the US abstaining on its own motion and voting against the Ukrainian’s. 

The Ukrainian resolution was a three-page document that included clauses noting that “the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has persisted for three years and continues to have devastating and long-lasting consequences not only for Ukraine, but also for other regions and global stability.”

It called for a commitment to “the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders”.

Ukraine’s version was eventually passed, supported by 93 countries, opposed by 18 with 65 abstentions including China.

The US voted with Russia, Belarus and Israel to oppose the Ukrainian resolution. The majority of the remainder of the 18 were African nations, indicating Russian imperialism’s increasing influence on the continent. 

Later, the US took its original resolution to the Security Council where it was carried 10-0. Five European countries abstained while the US, Russia and China voted in favour.

US imperialism’s about-face on Ukraine must be of concern to its cheer-leaders and lackeys in Australia.

For our part, we have never believed in the US-Australia “Alliance” and have rejected calls to accept US “security guarantees” allegedly contained in the ANZUS Alliance. 

The prospect of US imperialism demanding “compensation” for such “guarantees” is now a grim reality.

Will the Brisbane Line be revived and parts to the north of it ceded to the US?

The reality is that something like that is already underway through the US Force Posture Agreement.

Trump’s demands for compensation from Ukraine were described by one journalist as a “gangster protection racket disguised as foreign policy”.

Will we also need to pay the US for its “protection”?

The reality is that we are already committed through AUKUS to pay $30 million a day for the next 30 years – or $368 billion and counting – for a handful of submarines which they and we will pretend are “ours”, but which will be part of the US Navy on an interoperable and interchangeable basis.

It is time to end the grovelling to the US by loyalists to its Empire in Australia. 

We are determined to fight for an independent and peaceful Australia.

Both independence and peaceful non-alignment are cornerstones for our future and of equal value and importance.

Smash US imperialism!

For independence and socialism. 

Friday, February 21, 2025

How "highly credible" is corporate ownership of the Whyalla Steelworks?

Written by: Ned K. on 22 February 2025

 

(above: Malinauskas and Whyalla Steelworks workers    Source: InDaily)

With the Whyalla Steelworks in administration, large corporations are circling to see how much profit they are likely to make if they successfully bid to buy the Whyalla Steelworks. Corporations from Germany, South Korea, India along with Australian-based BlueScope are reported to be interested in buying and operating the steelworks. 

BlueScope is being promoted by SA Premier Malinauskas.  In the Adelaide Advertiser newspaper on 21/2/2025, Malinauskas is quoted as follows:

 "There is no secret about the fact that I've been talking, along with other members of our team, in the state government, to a range of potential owners, and BlueScope is only one of them. But let me say this, BlueScope a HIGHLY CREDIBLE (writer's emphasis) Australian publicly - listed company and I look forward to news emerging in coming days and weeks about how our relationship with BlueScope in Whyalla might be deeper again."
 
Malinauskas is a popular leader among the local capitalists and big event-based capitalists in SA with his brand of "bread and circuses" capitalism and his general confidence and belief in capitalism. 
 
To him, GFG Alliance was just a rotten tomato in a good "crop" of big businesses and BlueScope is not only a ripe tomato in the crop, but "highly credible"!
 
BlueScope's "Highly Credible" Record?
 
A closer look at the history of BlueScope makes the highly credible label an illusion.
 
BHP-Billiton owned Whyalla steel works and in July 2002 it split off its steel assets creating BHP Steel. 
 
17 November 2003 BHP Steel re-named BlueScope, perhaps a marketing ploy as BHP-Billiton was known as ruthless exploiter of workers across its international operations
 
2004 BlueScope merged with US corporation Butler Manufacturing which had twelve steel manufacturing plants in the USA, Mexico and China at the time.
 
October 2011 BlueScope, which owned Port Kembla Steelworks, closed its No 6 Blast Furnace reducing production capacity by 50%!
 
In 2012 BlueScope set up a new coated steel plant in the large industrial area of east India, Jamshedpur.
 
In 2019 BlueScope expanded its capital investment in the USA by $1 billion
 
In August 2019 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) started a civil case against BlueScope and its then CEO Jason Ellis for engaging in "cartel conduct"
 
In December 2022 the Federal Court of Australia found BlueScope and its CEO guilty of attempting to induce 8 steel distribution companies in Australia and an overseas manufacturer to enter agreements to fix and/or raise the level of pricing for flat steel products
 
In July 2020 BlueScope was fined $30,000 by SW Environment Protection Authority for failing to comply with dioxin air emission limits six times over two months of March and April.
 
BlueScope current Managing Director is quoted in the Adelaide Advertiser on Saturday on 21/2/2025 as saying BlueScope was a "net beneficiary" of US tariffs on imported steel and 45% of BlueScope" earnings" came from its US steel plants. He added that at the moment BlueScope is in the "early stages of a $200 million cost-cutting blitz to reap returns" (returns = profits)
 
At the same time, Albanese is on the phone to Trump to plead for exemption on tariffs on steel imported from Australia!
 
BlueScope US plants produce 3 million tonnes of steel a year. BlueScope exports 200,000- 300,000 tonnes of steel to the USA
 
Other corporations competing with BlueScope to make profits from the Whyalla Steelworks will no doubt have their own histories in their relentless search for profits or they call them "earnings". 
 
The only short-term solution to benefit the Whyalla community and Australian people as a whole is for the steelworks to be a government owned entity. The only longer-term solution is for major industries and services to be owned and run by the people in an independent, socialist Australia.

Whyalla Workers Steeled In Struggle Deserve Job Security -Nationalise the Steel Industry!

 Written by: Ned K. on 21 February 2025

 

The working-class community of Whyalla, led by over 1,000 steel workers have won a significant short-term victory. For months steel works workers and workers employed by contractors dependent on the steel works for their very existence, endured reductions in working hours, layoffs, weeks of work without being paid any wages in an economic climate of ever-increasing costs of living.

The steel workers and their Whyalla community affected allies repeatedly demanded action by the SA Government and GFG Alliance CEO, Sanjeev Gupta. Many promises were made by Gupta about the GFG Alliance commitment to the workers and to the SA Government that payment of lost wages, payment to GFG Alliance's many contractor feeder companies was just around the corner. However, the " corner" remained over the horizon!

The SA Premier Malinauskas read the mood of the town and the emptiness of Gupta's promises well. As well as the possible situation of GFG Alliance going belly-up and the steelworks grinding to a halt, he needed a fully functioning Whyalla Steelworks to be the main customer of his pre-election promise in 2022 to build a liquid hydrogen fuel plant at Whyalla.

By January 2025, the Labor Prime Minister Albanese could see disaster ahead if Australia's only producer of high-grade steel essential for the construction industry and rail transport stopped producing steel. It would cost him the loss of Seats in the federal election that he would call to be held one Saturday before mid-May 2025. 

In mid-February Premier Malinauskas pushes through SA Parliament an amendment to the 1958 Whyalla Steelworks Act to enable the GFG Alliance Whyalla Steelworks arm of its global economic "empire" to be put into administration.

The next day, Thursday 19 February, Premier Malinauskas and Prime Minister Albanese visited Whyalla and announced the much broadcast $2.4 billion "rescue package" to pay lost wages and pay contractors owed money by GFG Alliance, to keep the steelworks operating while it is under administration and to partly fund a modernization of the steelworks with a hoped-for new owner of the steelworks.

This announcement received a big sigh of temporary relief from workers and the whole Whyalla community. 

The appointed administrator Korda Mentha was also the administrator in 2017 which led to the previous owner of the steelworks, Arrium, being taken over by GFG Alliance. Korda Mentha is reported by the Adelaide Advertiser newspaper on Friday 20 February 2025 to charge $795 per hour per senior partner for administering the steelworks and sorting through GFG Alliance finances. Korda Mentha will also be making a recommendation to the SA and federal governments on which company should take over and own the steel works

The underlying cause of the current situation has been the large corporate owners of the steelworks, British-based GFG Alliance and those before it - Arrium, One Steel and its parent BHP have always put profits before the interests of the workers, Whyalla community and the Australian steel industry as a whole. 

These large corporations have not only made profits from the steelworks itself, but also from the nearby Middleback Ranges where they owned and mined some of the highest grade iron ore in the world. The iron ore from Iron Knob and Iron Monarch in these Ranges has purity of ore of over 60%. In the 1920s and 1930s before the steelworks at Whyalla was constructed, the high grade ore was shipped to Newcastle and Port Kembla steelworks. In 1939, the UK declared the ore to be the highest grade deposit of iron ore known in the world.

In the turmoil of the last few days, it was reported in mainstream media that GFG Alliance was propping up its European steelwork interests from profits made from the iron ore mines and the steel produced in the Whyalla steelworks

NATIONALISE THE STEEL INDUSTRY

Albanese in his announcement on Thursday 19 February rightly made the comment that the steel industry is part of Australia's national sovereignty. Malinauskas made the same point.

If they really believe this, rather than just sounding good before a federal election, they should take the first step towards a nationalised steel industry by placing the steelworks and iron ore mines at Whyalla into public hands.

Workers in Australia, led by the courageous people of Whyalla have the ability to operate the steelworks and the iron ore mines for the benefit of their community and the needs of Australian construction and expanding rail network construction.

Albanese and Malinauskas may say the steelworks need the "expertise" of a foreign owned multinational corporation or a nominally Australian owned company like Bluescope who operate Port Kembla steelworks. 

Or they may say Australia has not got the money to modernise our own steelworks.

Where then did the Albanese Government find the money to send to the USA to part-finance the building of more nuclear-powered submarines? Where do they miraculously find $368 billion to fund nuclear-powered submarines in coming decades?

DEMAND NATIONALISATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN STEEL INDUSTRY NOW!