Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Book Review: Motown and the making of working-class revolutionaries…

Written by: “Contributed - Craig Brittain” on 23 September 2026

 

A reader has sent us his review of a book on the League of Revolutionary Black Workers who were organised in the Detroit auto plants in the late 1960s. Rank and file workers in America, led by oppressed minority groups (Black workers and immigrant workers from Central and South America) have a proud history of waging the class struggle. This continues today, but is concealed by the US mainstream media and the two Party system of Republicans and Democrats - Eds.

"Working Class Marxists"

Review of: Jerome Scott and Walda Katz-Fishman (2025), Motown and the making of working-class revolutionaries: the story of the League of Revolutionary Black Workers, University of Georgia Press

Of all the radical groups to emerge in the U.S. in the 1960’s one of the most interesting was the League of Revolutionary Black Workers that began organising in the car industry in Detroit. 

Motown and the making of working-class revolutionaries is based on extensive interviews done with the surviving members of the League

Before and after the Second World War large numbers of Blacks had moved north from the southern states to escape segregation and police violence, and in search of the $5 a day Henry Ford was promising in his factories, when they were used to earning about $6 a week.

However, what they discovered in the car plants wasn’t the utopia they’d hope for - as usual, whites got the pick of the jobs, and Blacks did the dirty work. Management were white and so was the union. Both were racist.

Those who went north might not have experienced the legally sanctioned discrimination they’d experienced in the South, but there was plenty of discrimination nonetheless; in housing, education and employment. And the police were just the same.

In 1967 things came to a head in the Detroit Rebellion, which the media naturally referred to as “race riots”. President Johnson called in the National Guard and the military, which opened fire with machine guns upon ordinary Americans. 45 died in the street.

Finally, Black workers in Detroit had had enough. They started organising in their work places. A few student workers got together and created the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement or DRUM in May 1968 at the Chrysler Hamtramck Assembly Plant. Later on other RUMs (Revolutionary Union Movement) were set up in other plants and industries  - FRUM (Ford) and ELRUM (Chrysler Eldon Avenue), UPRUM (UPS United Parcel Service). They were formed in opposition to the United Auto Workers (U.A.W.). which like so many unions, then and now, had effectively become another branch of management. The U.A.W and the company had come to a convenient arrangement whereby the union would give advance notice of a strike. The companies would prepare and plan around it, effectively undermining the reason for going on strike in the first place. The union got financial and other kickbacks for this service.

The first thing the DRUM workers did was stage a wildcat strike over speedups on the assembly line. They were also protesting against the racist practices of the company and the union. 4000 workers walked off the job which stopped the production of 3000 cars.

Wildcat strikes became their main tactic.

The League of Revolutionary Black Workers was established to bring the various RUMs together and coordinate their activity. The leadership were Marxist-Leninist, but most of the production-line workers didn’t start out that way, they became Marxist on the shop floor.  

None of the white officials had counted on the fact that Blacks had learned strategies and tactics in the Civil Rights movement, the Black nationalist movement, and a range of socialist groups many had belonged to. They were experienced in mass meetings, collective decision-making, and direct action, and believed strongly in grass-roots leadership. And they knew how to put what they’d learnt to good use. 

Right at the beginning they set up newspapers to communicate with workers and the Black community at large. The Inner City Voice and South End became major sources of information.

As a group they were prepared to use whatever methods worked. It didn’t matter whether they’d originally come from the I.W.W., the Communist Party, the anarcho-syndicalists or the Maoists. 

They held demonstrations and rallies; issued plant bulletins and leaflets; picketed union headquarters and forced union executives to listen to their demands; boycotted nearby bars that refused to hire blacks. They also worked out how to quickly move pickets from one plant to another to outsmart the police… Two of the standard texts they studied were Mao’s “On Practice” and “On Contradiction”, which helped them analyse situations dialectically, and then decide what to do.

The League of Revolutionary Workers lasted two years (1969 - 1971) before it split. But it achieved a remarkable amount in that time. The split, when it occurred, was primarily over a difference of opinion about priorities. There were those like General Baker and Jerome Scott who felt that they should stick with what they’d set out to do - improve conditions for Blacks in the car industry; but others, like Mike Hamlin and Ken Cockerel wanted to broaden the focus to include areas like education and health care, publishing and film making. By-and-large the production-line workers thought that the Executive Branch were separating themselves from the workers and no longer listening to their grievances. They wanted more democracy; as it had been in DRUM at the beginning, when everyone had a say, and there wasn’t a gap between the “thinkers” (the Executive Branch) and the “workers” on the shop floor. Eventually, some of them, like Ernie Allen, were expelled for complaining, and the organisation didn’t last long much after that.

What is reassuring however (and true of most old leftist I know) is that they didn’t give up and become born-again capitalists or move to a commune in the country - they, each in their own way, kept up the struggle. Some members of the League, like Jerome Scott and General Baker, joined the Communist Labor Party, which eventually became the League of Revolutionaries for a New America, with the die-hard old radical, Nelson Peery.  They stuck with production workers in the factories and then, as automation and offshoring took over, increasingly concentrated on organising and educating the unemployed and under-employed. The other group went into community work, legal support, health work and local government. Both groups have made long-standing contributions. 

As one of the original League members, Luke Tripp, said in 2017: “The system in this country keeps me in a revolutionary orientation. The criminality and immorality of the system. Billionaires just sucking up all the wealth - super greedy, selfish and mean spirited. That’s what keeps me in a fighting spirit - a lot of outrage and anger.  Revolutionaries are fighters” p.155

The class struggle goes on. 

Another excellent book about the League is: Dan Georgakas’ and Marvin Surkin’s Detroit: I do mind dying: a study in urban revolution, St Martin’s Press, N.Y. 1975, available at the Internet Archive 
https://archive.org/details/detroitidominddy0000geor/page/n5/mode/1up

A documentary made by the group at the time is called Finally got the news and is available at the Internet Archive:
 https://archive.org/details/finally-got-the-news-1970

International Day of Peace action in Port Adelaide

Written by: Ned K on 22 September 2026

 

(Day of Peace participants march across the Port River Bridge. All photos supplied courtesy Fernando Goncalves)

On Sunday 20 September over 300 people gathered at the Workers' Memorial at the Black Diamond Corner at Port Adelaide as part of International Day of Peace actions against AUKUS across all States and Territories capitals and major regional centres such as Port Kembla as well.

The over 300 people attending the Port Adelaide actions were from many different groups including local resident members of Port Adelaide Community Opposing AUKUS (PACOA),

(PACOA speaker Eileen Darley)

Friends of Palestine, trade unions, women against war groups, environmental groups, First People's and tertiary education sector.

The significance of gathering at the Workers' Memorial at Port Adelaide was that previous generations of workers in the Port Adelaide area had taken action against Australia's involvement in imperialist wars, including the World War 1 and the Vietnam War. Seamen and dock workers at Port Adelaide had been active in the Vietnam Moratorium campaign and many lived in the Port Adelaide and Osborne area, the very place where the Australian Government and its master US and UK imperialists planned to waste $368 billions of taxpayer's money building nuclear powered and armed submarines at Osborne Naval Base, a few kilometres from the Workers Memorial.

There were many speakers demanding an end to AUKUS and no nuclear submarines.

A First People's speaker from APY Lands, Coralie Lester reminded everyone of the devasting impact on First Peoples from the UK's atomic bomb explosions at Maralinga in the 1950s and the danger to people today not only of AUKUS making Port Adelaide a nuclear target, but the dangers associated with turning South Australia in to an AUKUS nuclear waste dump.

One of many highlights of the day's actions was the arrival of Peace walkers, waving First Peoples’ flags. They had walked from Port Augusta in the mid north of SA to Port Adelaide, timing their arrival at Port Adelaide with the International Day of Peace actions.

Their arrival was enthusiastically received by all present, leading to dancing on the Port wharves to the music of the Fiddle We Must Band.

The following day, a delegation of International Day of Peace participants took the Anti- AUKUS no nuclear subs message to the Port Adelaide office of federal MP Mark Butler, whose office at Port Adelaide is a "stone's throw" from the Workers Memorial.

As the people's movement against AUKUS grows, those MPs who ignore it will be case aside, especially an MP like Mark Butler whose Seat covers the site on which the nuclear submarines are planned to be built.

Party’s discussion paper published


A CPA (M-L) discussion paper sent to the 13th Congress of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star this September has been published on the Media & Archives/Booklets drop down menu on our website. It can also be accessed here

The Red Star comrades asked us to address the question of a paradigm shift in the balance of power between the imperialist states.

The paper identifies the main imperialist states; claims that Australia can be correctly defined as an advanced capitalist country under the domination of US imperialism; and offers opinions on how Indian and Australian revolutionaries, in each of our respective countries, can address tensions in our region.

It discusses whether or not imperialism is best thought of as the highest, or the latest, stage of imperialism and whether or not the five characteristics of imperialism identified by Lenin are still relevant. 

In relation to the inter-imperialist rivalry between China and the United States, it argues that “Efforts must be made to counter views sympathetic to Chinese social-imperialism. We do not want the US to launch a war with China, but neither do we accept the view that China’s expansion is a strategy designed to oppose US hegemonism. There should be no support for China as a leader of anti-hegemonic struggle when it is itself striving for hegemony.”

Trump and Xi meeting will not solve the crises inflicted on the people

Trump and Xi meeting will not solve the crises inflicted on the people

Written by: Nick G. on 22 September 2026

 

(Trump and Xi in Beijing May 2026  Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

The upcoming visit of Xi Jinping to the United States, where he will meet and have talks with US President Trump, will see both imperialist powers trying to gain advantages over the other.

The US is the world’s strongest imperialist power measured in military projection and diplomatic reach. China is equally strong economically and is building a strong military which already rivals the US in key areas such as submarine and aircraft carrier numbers and in the application of AI and robotics to war plans.

But their respective strengths are fluid, with the US in an overall position of decline while the Chinese are the rising power.

Xi Jinping hopes to manoeuvre Trump into having to accept a certain degree of cooperation, even collusion, while Trump sees the relationship mainly as one of confrontation. Xi pushes for “multipolarity” or a strategic balance of power, whereas Trump’s view is largely unipolar with the US hoping to maintain its position of global hegemony.

Trump has been forced to accept the failure to bring the Iranians to their knees, despite his barbaric boasting that he would destroy their civilisation though intense bombing and missile attacks. Instead, the Iranians have inflicted considerable damage on 15 US military facilities throughout the Persian Gulf and destroyed several radar facilities designed to protect against missile attacks and worth billions of dollars. Far from winding down, the regional conflict is only heightening as the Houthis seize extra territory from the Yemeni regime. They now have 80% of the population and two thirds of Yemeni territory, and threaten Saudi Arabian oil exports through both the Bab el-Mandeb strait and the Saudi east-west pipeline, causing world oil prices to rise.

Trump has also failed to exercise any significant influence over the course of Russia’s war against Ukraine, despite boasting prior to being elected that he would end the Ukraine war in "one day" because he "got along very well" with the Russians. His various plans to end the war have come to nothing with recent escalations of the conflict on both sides, including successful Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil refineries and pipelines.  In the first eight months of 2026, a Russian refinery was hit on average once every three days. Russian oil production is at its lowest level in more than 20 years and roughly 30% below a year earlier. Reported gasoline output is down by 20% compared with 2025 levels, while diesel production is estimated to have fallen by nearly 30%, prompting the government to restrict fuel exports to protect domestic supplies.

The Chinese see the US mired in difficulties and try to get them to accept “a constructive relationship of strategic stability.” When Xi met Trump in Beijing in May, Xi offered four dimensions of such a relationship: “a positive stability with cooperation as the mainstay, a sound stability with moderate competition, a constant stability with manageable differences, and an enduring stability with promises of peace.” He will no doubt pursue this with Trump when they meet on September 24.

Whilst there are these two aspects to inter-imperialist rivalry, namely, cooperation and collusion on one hand and contention and confrontation on the other, it is the latter that is all-embracing, permanent and absolute, while their cooperation and collusion is partial, temporary and relative. That is the nature of the contradiction between them that arises from each other’s attempt to achieve global hegemony.

The strategic decline of the US inclines it towards unilateral expressions of domination and power such as its recent declaration that it already has weapons in the new warfare domain of space, and in its coerced agreement with Denmark and Greenland to permanently exclude Russian and Chinese military and economic presence in Greenland.

The strategic rise of China inclines it towards placing its rival on the defensive, letting it expend its energy in conflicts it cannot win, and outsmarting it diplomatically by being the voice of reason and avoidance of confrontation.  It is strong enough economically to withstand the bullying of US sanctions and tariffs.

The contradictions between US imperialism and Chinese social-imperialism are irreconcilable and now extend beyond the globe to outer space. “Multipolarity” and “strategic stability” can only be empty words so long as imperialism exists.

The old adage that so long as imperialism exists, so too does the danger of world war, remains true.

The just struggles of the peoples of the world for the independence of their nations and for overthrowing capitalism and advancing along the socialist path will continue until the end of the imperialism system.

Sunday, September 20, 2026

“Imperialism wounds so many people. We can’t look away.”

Written by: Louisa L. on 21 September 2026

 

(Stomping on US puppets as resistance flags fly -Supplied)

On the 54th Anniversary of the imposition of martial law in the Philippines, around 50 gathered in Sydney, before an anti-Aukus, pro-Palestine rally.

Claude Mostowic, representing Pax Christi, spoke first. He condemned ongoing colonialism both here and overseas. He pointed out the Catholic Church had stood for truth and justice in the Philippines. But in Australia the McMahon government endorsed martial law by providing military aid. Mostowic spoke of the “violence of silence”.

But his particular target was US imperialism.

“We can’t look away,” he said. “Imperialism wounds so many people. Yet the struggle always continues.”

A number of young people also spoke. From Migrante, Aya hailed the massive anti-corruption protests. She said, “My pride comes from my people.”

US embassy drools over war bases and potential profits 

Vanguard recently reported, “During December, 2025, the Trump administration finalised an agreement with the Philippines to establish a huge AI facility on 4,000 acres of land with a 99 year lease. Based in Tarlac Province, the proposed Pax Silica facility has made use of the former US Clark Air Force Base, officially closed in 1991, with the ending of the previous Cold War.” 

On August 31, Indigenous peoples, farmers, scientists, workers, students and many others protested against Pax Silica and the massive the US Luzon Economic Corridor, which includes Pax Silica. 

A drooling US Embassy in the Philippines factsheet – a must read! – lays out the staggering scale of the project. It calls the massive Luzon Economic Corridor, a “trilateral” initiative between the US, Japan and the Philippines, plus Australian and other US “partners” But in reality, it carves up 50 percent of the Philippine’s economy under US military and corporate control. https://ph.usembassy.gov/fact-sheet-luzon-economic-corridor/ 

Speakers in Sydney praised “the new generation of Filipino youth” rising here and overseas, saying the only way is to fight. Instead of parliamentarism, “We see the people rise up against US imperialism.”

 

Friday, September 18, 2026

Transdev bosses are spewing, but oh, so politely, as they take on MUA ferry workers in Sydney

Written by: Louisa L. on 18 September 2026

 

(Photo supplied)

Transdev began as part of a French state-owned financial institution, Caisse des Dépôts Group. In 2019 the German family-owned Rethmann Group took a 66% controlling share.  Rethmann made its billions through the private water, raw material and waste management company, Remondis.

Worth $11.7 billion, the Rethmanns are Germany’s 10th richest family. They own a controlling share in Transdev, that runs Sydney Ferries.  

Transdev had nearly $17billion revenue 2025. Through September, Seek was advertising a ferry job for Casual General Purpose Hand “$42.60 per hour plus super plus penalty rates”. 

Poor old Rethmanns! They can’t afford to pay workers more. 

On Friday 4 September, Transdev’s Sydney Ferries workers, led by MUA Sydney branch began a month’s protected industrial action for a new EBA. Ferries are operating free for customers. 

Transdev bosses are spewing, but oh, so politely! They announced, “Fares have not changed during the industrial action. Opal readers are operating and customers should tap on and tap off as usual, including where gates are open or unattended.” But with gates locked open and signs announcing the free ride, customers happily walk on through.

(Photo supplied)

Transdev reckons it empowers “freedom to move every day thanks to safe, reliable and innovative transport solutions that serve the common good.” It boasts its 7100 Australian and NZ employees provided 271million trips.  

But the company, not workers, shut down ferries to Parramatta for two days. It’s a favourite way from Sydney’s midwestern business heart to get to Sydney.

This time passengers were spewing in Transdev’s help-the-poor-bucket.

A reunion crew of retired state school teachers cheered for the workers as they headed for takeaway at Watsons Bay. The reply, ‘MUA, here to stay!’

 

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Visiting US Congressman reveals a few home truths

 Written by: Nick G. on 16 September 2026

 

A visiting US politician has just stated that US nuclear-powered submarines stationed at the Stirling naval base in WA can be assumed to be carrying nuclear weapons.

Michael McCaul, a former chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee, said that US submarines that rotate through Western Australia under the AUKUS pact could be carrying nuclear weapons and Australia should welcome that.

McCaul made the comments to the Sydney Morning Herald in Washington after returning from an official visit to Australia as part of a congressional delegation. While there, he met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Defence Minister Richard Marles, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Conroy, among others.

This gang of four US Empire loyalists, at the heart of the Australian government, have not dared ask their US masters whether US planes and submarines in Australia will be carrying nuclear weapons. 

They prefer to sell-out our sovereignty, professing to honour the US policy of neither conforming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons in Australia.

But McCaul, one of the richest members of the US Congress, has saved them the embarrassment of their silence by telling us to “just assume” US bombers and submarines are carrying nuclear weapons.

When questioned whether the stationing of US troops, bombers and submarines in Australia, often referred to by the weasel word “rotation” to disguise their now permanent presence here, made us a target, he confirmed that too. 

“Australia is a target,” he said.

He said it was “absolutely critical” that Australia joined the US in any conflict with China over Taiwan, and had no doubt Australia would do so. “I don’t think it was even questioned. It’s just obvious,” he said.

Of course its obvious when you look at the calibre of those Australian politicians most strongly supportive of the hold that the US has over our country.

Australia must honour the Treaty of Rarotonga under which Australia has committed not to acquire its own nuclear weapons nor allow others to station their nuclear weapons on our soil or in our waters. 

While the US Empire loyalists busy themselves listening to their master’s voice, we prefer to listen to the voices of the Australian people which are becoming more and more insistent on breaking the hold of US imperialism over Australia.

We should thank McCaul for calling in on us and clarifying, through his arrogance and his assumptions, that we are not an independent nation, and that our rulers deserve to be treated like the puppets they are.