Showing posts with label Liberal Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Party. Show all posts

Monday, July 5, 2021

Pentacostals and alleged branch-stacking in SA Liberal Party

 


Written by: (Contributed) on 7 July 2021

The recent announcement that the South Australian Liberal Party State Branch had terminated the membership of a large number of members on the basis that their views were politically unacceptable may not have had much of a national focus.

The SA problem, however, has national implications for the Liberal party and those Pentacostalists, like PM Scummo Morrison, who are embedded in its leadership.

A tendency for far-right political standpoints to be assimilated in mainstream political culture has been a feature for decades, with social media now assisting in a proliferation of questionable political views.

Alex’s antics

In mid-June the SA Liberal Party terminated the membership of 150 'conservative' members together with a further 400 required to 'show cause' why they should not be treated in a similar manner. (1) Matters came to a head after a party recruitment drive targeting hundreds of Pentecostal Christians after controversial legislation passed by the Marshall SA Liberal government about euthanasia and abortion. (2)

The membership drive was organised by the right-wing SA Liberal Senator Alex Antic.

Antic’s paternal family is Serbian.  In his maiden speech to the federal parliament, he said “Theirs was a family of small-business people on a postwar collision course with the rise of communism in the Balkans. My grandmother's distrust of the communist regime, which had already stripped her family of its modest assets, led her to lecture my father about the importance of private ownership, entrepreneurship and basic freedoms.”

Elected to the Adelaide City Council, Antic proved to be a ruthlessly ambitious member of the hard right faction in the SA Liberal Party.  His first victim was Kenyan-born Lucy Gichuhi who had come into the Senate in 2017 as a replacement for SA’s Family First Senator Bob Day who was deemed to have been ineligible for election. Although a social conservative, she disagreed with the merger of Family First with SA Senator Cory Bernardi’s short-lived Conservative Party and subsequently sat in the Senate as an Independent. She joined the Liberals in 2018, but Antic challenged her for the third position on the SA Liberal Senate ticket. Despite her endorsement by then PM Turnbull, former PM Howard and SA Liberal Party President John Olsen, and despite her unique position as the first black African woman elected to parliament, Antic was able to defeat her and was elected to the Senate in 2019.

His enthusiasm for knocking down women in his Party from a non-Anglo background saw State Liberal Member of the Legislative Council Jing Lee, a Malaysian-born Chinese-Australian, become his next victim. 

In the developing atmosphere of anti-Chinese racism, Lee was prevented from being elected as President of the Legislative Council despite having been preselected for the position by the Liberals and personally backed by State Premier Steven Marshall. She was attacked for having attended a function of the pro-Chinese Xinjiang Association of SA.  The attack was led by Antic, and MPs Nicole Flint and Tony Pasin. All are aligned with the hard right led by Peter Dutton. Jing Lee was the Premier’s choice.  Mud-slinging by the Australian alleged that Jing Lee was a threat to Australia on national security grounds.  Liberal MLC John Dawkins was persuaded to run against her, and was expelled from the Party when he won. Nothing was done to Antic, however, who proved to be more powerful than the State premier.

Antic and his allies in the SA Liberal Party clearly had the so-called moderate faction led by Marshall in their sights. Antic personally attended Pentecostal gatherings and urged them to join the Liberals. Exploiting their opposition to the abortion legislation, he had enough success to really concern the Marshall faction. Following protests against the Party’s decision to review the membership of the new recruits, the SA Branch decided to soften their decision by re-considering the 150 members affected by earlier decisions and abandoning their insistence upon statutory declarations for party loyalty with the remainder. (3) The moves, nevertheless, reflect deeper problems inside the Liberal Party with fears of branch-stacking by Antic and his supporters.

Pentacostalism 

Coming so soon after the recent federal parliamentary inquiry into political extremism there may also be an added twist to previous and later decisions taken by the SA Liberal Branch. It was noted, for example, that 'Christian leaders … were … demanding answers as to how it came to pass that the SA Liberals regarded their involvement in politics as a threat'. (4)

While the timing of recent developments may have been coincidental, the creeping inroads by far-right political organisations into the Liberal Party was a topic given discussion during the recent parliamentary inquiry. 

Pentecostalism is a conservative religious doctrine with an emphasis upon literal biblical teachings and strict codes of conduct not favouring “adventurous behaviour”, together with a preoccupation on reducing sexual temptation and desires. It is socially divisive in approach, and in many ways, reactionary: in fact, their websites reveal the denomination to be more akin to a sect, with strong beliefs and an easily recognisable command structure. It is a manifestation of petty-bourgeois individualism, promoting the seeking of salvation in the afterlife through euphoric personal experience of God (speaking in tongues and “happy-clapping”), and earthly rewards of wealth and riches (“prosperity theology”).

Federal implications for Liberal Party 

The controversial euthanasia and abortion legislation in the SA parliament had included lengthy and heated political debates which were politically divisive; the euthanasia legislation only passed the lower house with 33 for and 11 against, the abortion legislation passed the lower house with 29 in favour and 15 against. (5) But the debate soon spilled over into the federal sphere.

A great deal of the political drama has been played-out in the federal seat of Boothby, held by Nicolle Flint M.P., who is part of the Liberal Party conservative wing. (6) Boothby has been regarded as a safe Liberal seat for over fifty years, although with recent boundary changes is now only held by a 2.8 per cent majority. A swing in favour of the ALP would effectively end Liberal control of one of their most prized political possessions in South Australia.

The statement by Antic that the recent expulsions would 'cost the government the seat of Boothby at the next poll' reveal how developments inside the local Liberal Party are regarded as having implications for Canberra. (7)

Long history of religious manipulation

Political parties attempting recruitment through religious denominations has a long and troubled history in Australia. While Catholic divisions split the ALP in the 1950s, effectively keeping the main party out of government for decades, recent moves by the Liberals to recruit large numbers of Mormons and Catholics in Victoria in 2017 led to allegations of branch stacking. Similar moves by the hard-right in Sydney-based Liberal branches have also been recorded. (8)

Behind the recruitment drives of religious denominations, however, lie some very murky forces; right-wing and far-right political groups have long used religious bodies to shroud their agendas and provide a cloak of respectability.

In South Australia two such political organisations have had a long history of involvement with religion.

The shadowy National Civic Council (NCC) is a predominantly Catholic body lurking in a respectable suburb behind a glitzy website. The equally shadowy Australian League of Rights (ALOR), likewise, has a long history of involvement with the Liberal Party.

It has become a common feature for issues and causes raised by such organisations to enter into the mainstream political culture of the Liberal Party. While the far-right are usually united over nationalism, racism, opposition to 'alien' immigration and a general distain for democratic values, evidence of a more paranoid style of political thinking linked to endless conspiracy theories is also commonplace. (9)

It is not difficult to find numerous examples.

One particularly noteworthy example of such behaviour included a former federal Liberal M.P., Ken Alfred, with involvement with the NCC, who openly flouted a conspiracy linking Israeli intelligence with money-laundering scams in Victoria together with labelling Michael Costello, then head of Foreign Affairs, with accepting bribes from Israeli agents and having links with Latin American drug dealers. (10) No evidence to support the claims was ever tabled.

The ALOR, likewise, has a long history of similar political behaviour; former leader Eric Butler believed 'Churchill, Roosevelt and Curtain were covert communists and the Russian revolution was a Jewish plot'; he was later labelled as being regarded as 'nutty as a fruit-cake'. (11)  

The ALOR, however, has also been noted for 'great value on any contacts … with clergymen', and their various publications have included religious items with contemporary political commentary which, interestingly, coincide with similar concerns raised by the SA 'conservatives' in the recent controversy. (12) Whether hidden hands have been at inside the SA Liberals has yet to be established; numerous questions, nevertheless, arise.

It has long been noted, however, that 'many politicians flirted with the League … and … the trick was to denounce the League in public but use obscure members as workhorses in the electoral office. In this way parliamentarians could rejoice in a cosy chat with Butler'. (13)

The ALOR is also the main Australian affiliate with the far-right World League for Freedom and Democracy (WLFD), formerly the World Anti-Communist League (WACL). (14) The organisation has been described by one former member as 'a collection of oriental fascists, militarists, right-wing terrorists who put bombs in civilian aircraft, death squads, assassins, criminals and many people who are as much opposed to democracy as they are communism'. (15)

It is not difficult to establish Liberal Party links with the WLFD/WACL. (16)

The 1989 22nd WACL conference held in Brisbane, for example, was attended by John Howard and fellow Liberal M.P. Bruce Goodluck, amongst the 120 delegates representing fifty countries. (17) Howard has long been applauded by 'conservatives' as their leader of choice, who still remains popular with those sections of the party. Bruce Skeggs, a leading Victorian Liberal, likewise, was an executive member of the WLFD and under his leadership there were three major conferences in Australia. (18)

Such examples were well known inside Liberal Party circles: the publication The Liberals by Ian Hancock 'portrays John Howard as a powerful supporter of the Right faction, willing to intervene at key moments and block democratic reforms when it suited the faction's interests'. (19) The publication also threw light upon the Liberal Party in NSW as 'dysfunctional, factionalised, and rife with branch-stacking'. (20) Those portrayed in mainstream media as squeaky-clean political men of the centre, had a carefully prepared image. They carried, however, considerable baggage which was kept well hidden by senior Liberal Party officials.

Perhaps those responsible for investigating recent internal problems in the SA Liberal Party should cast their nets a little wider than a few hundred devout Christian zealots and identify the puppet-masters in their midst. Their chosen method of communications and extensive use of social media might also prove a treasure trove of political intrigue. That is, if those concerned actually want the truth to be known; the WLFD, for example, use locked websites for affiliates and the general membership to hide their identities. Their secure communications, presumably, include reports from their activists and their localities. There is nothing open and transparent about the WACL/WLFD and the role their affiliates provide.

While seek, as the old saying goes, and you might find, is one approach, opening political disadvantage as both SA State and federal election campaigns loom on the horizon is, perhaps, something else for both Steven Marshall and Scott Morrison.

It will be interesting to see how the Australian Liberal Party deals with the problem.

By their actions, or lack of them, they will be known!

 

1.     Libs fury over a party 'purge', Australian, 16 June 2021.
2.     Nicolle Flint slams Liberal membership move, ABC News, 13 June 2021; and, 'Your views', InDaily, 7 June 2021.
3.     Christian soldiers fight back in Liberals' holy war, The Weekend Australian, 19-20 June 2021.
4.     Ibid.
5.     Voluntary assisted dying law,  ABC News, 9 June 2021; and, Abortion decriminalisation,  ABC News, 19 February 2021.
6.     Tensions within Liberal Party, ABC News, 18 February 2021.
7.     Australian, op.cit., 16 June 2021. Wikipedia: Branch-stacking, 18 June 2021.
9.     The far-right's creeping influence on Australian politics, The Conversation, 13 August 2018.
10.   Putsch to extremes, The Weekend Australian, 17-18 September 2005.
11.   Anti-Semitic zealot held surprising political sway, Australian, 13 June 2006.
12.   Voices of Hate, K. D. Gott, (Melbourne, 1965), page 38; and Advance on Global Religion, Intelligence Survey, ALOR., April 1998; and, Organ Transplant Morality, June 1998, which raised questions about brain death, which in turn raised questions about euthanasia.
13.   Australian, op.cit., 13 June 2006.
14.   Inside the League, Scott Anderson and Jon Lee Anderson, (New York, 1986), page 276.

15.   Ibid., Foreword.
16.   Ibid., page 59, which has reference to the Australian section of the WACL being composed of Conservative M.P.s, interspersed with Neo-Nazis, racists, and Eastern European immigrants whose roots lay in the fascist collaborationist armies of World War Two.
17.   Wikipedia: WLFD., 12 December 2020.
18.   Wikipedia: Bruce Skeggs (1932-2013).
19.   Veteran Lib slams party's far right, Australian, 24 September 2007.
20.   Ibid.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Baillieu shafted by nutters

Vanguard April 2013 p. 5
Bill F.


We all knew that the Victorian Liberal Premier, ‘do nothing’ Ted Baillieu, was in his political death throes, but were the fatal wounds from falling on his sword or from knives in his back?

Baillieu’s sudden resignation took place against a backdrop of murky events and disclosures.

There was the revelation of secretly recorded conversations between the state Liberal Party Director Damien Mantach, Premier Baillieu’s Chief of Staff Tony Nutt and disgraced former staffer Tristan Weston. Weston had been sacked after his role in the conspiracy to destabilise the former Labor-appointed Police Commissioner, Simon Overland, had been exposed.

Mantach and Nutt promised to look after Weston, offering him money, accommodation and help finding another job. Maybe they had good reason to keep him ‘gruntled’? Other sacked workers never get treated this way, and many don’t even get their legal entitlements.

When all this hit the fan, Baillieu flicked it to the newly formed Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Meanwhile Nutt had reassured Weston, an ex-cop, that the IBAC investigators would not include people from the old Office of Police Integrity who may have had prior dealings with him.

The other character, Damien Mantach, is still hanging on with vocal support from Tony Abbott. “I know Damien Mantach well. He is a person of integrity. So let’s see where this investigation goes. He has my confidence.”

Finally, the erratic right-wing backbencher Geoff Shaw, himself already under investigation for alleged rorts, resigned from the Liberal Party with stage-managed drama, triggering another crisis.

With all this going on, Baillieu, whether pushed or he jumped, was sidelined, and the ‘safe’ seat-warmer Denis Napthine was resurrected to become Premier. That is, at least until the federal election makes Tony Abbott the next Prime Minister.

What a stew! Who made the secret recordings? Who spilt the beans? Who benefitted?

This rubbish is ‘business as usual’ in Australian parliamentary politics. No wonder people are cynical – they are kept in the dark like mushrooms, disempowered by ‘fat cats’ who can pay $10,000 to have private dinners with government ministers, and manipulated by media moguls singing the hymns of ‘free trade’, foreign investment, and the need to cut wages and conditions to compete in the globalised market!

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Victorian Mini-ABCC takes on construction workers

Vanguard July 2012 p. 9
Brian Boyd

Excerpts from a report by Brian Boyd, Victorian Trades Hall Council Secretary, for Victorian Building Industry Unions.

(Above: Baillieu, another budgie-smuggling bastard of the boss class)

The Victorian Baillieu Government is now well known for treating its own public sector workforce with disrespect and even contempt.

Not content with mistreatment of the very people who are employed to deliver State government services, the Baillieu government has now declared war on the State’s private sector construction workforce. The Victorian Building Unions and their members are to be targeted for being too successful in negotiating, through the legal EBA process, decent wages and conditions.  Baillieu wants to slash these gains on behalf of the Master Builders and big developers.

Back in April the Victorian Government created the Construction Code Compliance Unit (CCCU) of the Department of Treasury and Finance and published an updated Victorian Code for the building and construction industry.  It has appointed well know union basher Niger Hadgkiss to be the unit director.  Hadgkiss assisted the Cole Royal Commission into the national building industry over 10 years ago.

The Royal Commission led to no corruption charges against any building union officials, yet its so called ‘findings’ were used by the Howard government to create some of the most anti-union legislation enacted in Australia.

An Interim Building Industry Taskforce (IBIT) and eventually the infamous ABCC were created after the Royal Commission in order to harass building workers and their unions.  Nigel Hadgkiss worked for both bodies… Now Nigel Hadgkiss is ‘back in town’. Over the years he has made no secret he hates the Victorian building unions the most.  It is believed that Federal Opposition leader Tony Abbot is advising Ted Baillieu on IR strategies.  Abbott created the ABCC. The building unions are well aware of Tony Abbott’s antipathy towards them.  Obviously the conservative political forces want to increase the conflict once again in the nation’s construction industry.

International multinationals have huge resources and infrastructure projects on the drawing board.  Labour costs cut into their big profit margins, that’s why their friends in politics and the media continually beat up the IR laws debate.

Not only do these interests of capital want to reduce wages and conditions but also want the unfettered right to import thousands of overseas workers to carry out as much of the nation’s construction work as possible.

The employers’ obsession with IR laws often centres around the “right of entry” of union organisers, especially on project sites.  The developers want to restrict a union’s ability to organise and educate workers about their rights and the history of wage rates and other entitlements, never mind how to improve on them.  Already there is one major resource site in Western Australia where the overseas visa workers are being paid only 50% of the established going rate for that type of work.

Premier Baillieu has been ‘banging on’ about construction costs ever since he took office.  He has called on the federal government to have a national enquiry into the issue. The Federal government is entertaining the idea the idea of ‘providing’ special treatment for big projects.

The history of improving wages and conditions for all construction workers over time, is often through organising on such projects.  Gains on the bigger projects trickle down and spread out to the wider industry, via the mobility of workforce over time.  The employers are well aware of how expectations of wages and conditions are transferred around the industry. Obviously, there are now concentrated moves to thwart this well established practice.

The role of new Victorian mini-ABCC, i.e., the CCCU (Nigel Hadgkiss’ Construction Code Compliance Unit of the Department of Treasury and Finance) will be part of this wider anti-worker strategy. Any employer who negotiates outside the dictates of the new Victorian Code will be put on a Baillieu ‘blacklist’, in terms of not being allowed to bid for future government contracts. Additionally, workers on sites who wear union insignia such as  hard-hat stickers or badges or cause flags to be flown, can also cause the ‘blacklist’ to be activated!

The work of the Construction Code Compliance Unit of the Department of Treasury and Finance and its associated Code started officially on 1st July, 2012. To mark the occasion the Victorian Building Industry unions called a mass rally and march on Wednesday 4 July, 2012.  Building workers from all over Victoria were called into Melbourne to let Premier Baillieu and his union-busting puppet Nigel Hadgkiss know their wage cutting plans were not on.

The building unions and their members know they are in for a long fight. The 4 July rally is only the beginning of a broader defence strategy.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Turnbull puts the heat on Abbott

Vanguard May 2012 p. 4
Bill F.


Malcolm Turnbull has been hoisting up a few flags recently, just to remind his parliamentary mates that he can generate wider appeal (and more votes) than the more openly reactionary Tony Abbott.

Looking at the real possibility of a Coalition win at the next Federal election, there is some fear in those circles that Abbott could well snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

While the Gillard government is on the nose, Abbott’s head-kicking style and negativity are also wearing thin.

Turnbull senses this and is putting forward a different position to the Abbott line, one that seems more reasonable and intelligent.

His interview in The Monthly magazine is a sign that sections of the ruling class feel smarter tactics are required to maintain the illusion of democracy, and for imperialism to continue its divide and rule over the Australian people.

For example, unlike Abbott, Turnbull accepts the overwhelming evidence of climate warming. Not only this, he rejects the notion of falling into line with US climate policy. “... the Americans are in a period of dysfunctionality on this … the Chinese are very alert to it and are introducing an emissions trading scheme. It’s a trial and it’s got a very small price, but the Chinese do take it seriously... I think we are more likely to see leadership out of China than America.”

In fact, Turnbull broke from the accepted Coalition line on Iraq. “The argument for saying it was a mistake and misconceived is a very powerful one … There are plenty of people on both sides of politics in the US who take that view.”

Leaving both Abbott and Gillard stuck in the quagmire, Turnbull has also broken ranks on Afghanistan, saying there was little hope of “what many in the West think of as victory”.

On these issues Turnbull appears to be more in touch with the attitudes of the Australian people than most of the Labor and Coalition parliamentary crew. However, it is really just a case of another ego-driven politician giving the ruling class another option.