Ned
K.
In
recent years there has been a significant increase in the number of
private-for-profit operators moving into residential aged care.
The
giant BUPA private health fund is well established in the aged care industry in
most states. More recently, private equity companies like Archer Capital have
been buying aged care facilities in the eastern states and now South Australia,
with their takeover of Elderly Citizens Homes’ residential care.
Archer
Capital trades as Allity in aged care and is moving into the sector as the
funding arrangements by the federal government enable aged care providers to
charge more (and increase profit) from residents under a user-pays system.
Companies
like Allity have a strategy of being one of the higher payers of staff in the
industry to attract and retain staff to provide a consistency of care to over-charged
residents. This is a clever strategy because companies like Allity know that
the
increasing
numbers of migrant workers in the sector are desperate for a living wage to
establish the basics of life for their families.
However,
what it disguises is the research done by several university studies which show
that the private-for profit operators in aged care have the worst record on
safe staffing levels and safe workloads.
When
the Abbott Government announced that it would not require aged care providers
to direct increased government funding of $1.2 billion to staff wages and safe
workloads and safe staffing levels, the association representing the private
providers cheered from the rooftops.
Workers
in the industry are struggling collectively to win fair workloads and decent
work to provide better care for the residents. They are doing this by raising
these issues for inclusion in enterprise bargaining agreements where better
conditions of work are often the top issue ahead of a wage rise.
While
the Fair Work Act restricts their options for effective industrial action in an
industry where going on strike is a last resort, aged care workers have in a
growing number of cases voted a majority “No” to Agreements that do not address
staffing and safety issues to make a point. Their unity in struggle is sure to
grow.
No comments:
Post a Comment