From an article by Brian Boyd, Secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall Council
The APPEA
head said there was currently $180 billion worth of investment on the table. It
turns out “lower costs” is code for less wages and conditions for resource
sector workers. Mr Byers called for Tony Abbott to introduce “a new type of
enterprise agreement.” He said current EBA arrangements between contractors and
miners were “driving up costs.”
The
whining was pathetic from the APPEA. Apparently unions on behalf of workers
used earlier struck agreements as a “the floor for wages and conditions” when
renegotiations for new agreements occurred! Shock! Horror! This process has
been going on for a hundred years.
Mr Byers
specifically wanted more
limitations on right of entry of unions, an end of unions using previous
agreements to be a starting point for new arrangements and an end to labour
market testing for foreign workers coming in on 457 visas.
In recent
times APPEA board chair Martin Ferguson (former federal ALP MP and former
President of the ACTU) has singled out the MUA and the CFMEU for attack. Their
crime; fighting for decent wages and conditions for workers on major resource
projects. They were disgusting attacks on two unions that work hard to
represent their members and potential members.
This
behaviour by Ferguson has been sustained for some time. Recently the West
Australian Trades and Labour Council (Unions WA) and the Victorian Trades Hall
Council (VTHC) have passed resolutions calling on the ALP to expel Martin
Ferguson from the Party for his public union-bashing.
Recently,
multi-billionaire mining magnate Ms Gina Rinehart has been exposed as misusing
Sec 457 workers on her new project at Roy Hill WA. Some wages are reported to
be as low as $18/hour! Is this the new “floor” the APPEA is aiming for?
The FWBC/
ABCC 11 head Nigel Hadgkiss back in March called for agreement clauses allowing
industry-wide Rostered Days Off (RDOs), weekend shutdowns and restrictions on
subcontractors and labour hire to be “consigned to the past where they belong”.
The truth behind Aussie wage levels
In The Age
of Monday February 10, 2014, Ross Gittins reported under the heading – “the
fiction of excessive wage growth”:
“It’s
been two decades since we had reason to worry about excessive wage growth. This
remains true despite cabinet ministers and some economists saying we have a
problem.
“The
structural reason we don’t have to worry is the continuing effect of the
Hawke-Keating government’s micro-economic reforms – particularly the floating
of the dollar, the removal of protection against imports, deregulation of many
industries and the move from central wage-fixing to bargaining at the
enterprise level.
In The Age
of Thursday 20 February, 2014 Peter Martin reported under the heading: “Wage
growth very low, contrary to what government says”:
“Don’t
believe what you’ve heard. Wages are barely climbing. The Bureau of Statistics compiles
the only reliable measure and it came out on Wednesday (19 February 2014).
“In the
year to December 31, the bureau’s wage price index climbed 2.6 per cent. That’s
less than inflation – which is 2.7 per cent.”
On the same day in The Herald Sun of Thursday 20 February 2014, in the business section,
under the heading – “Wages growing at slowest rate since 1997” it is reported”:
“It is
becoming increasingly tough to land a job, but securing a pay rise seems just
as difficult, with wages growing at their weakest pace for more than 15 years.”
“Labour productivity is improving. Last
financial year it rose 2.2 per cent, the fastest growth in 11 years, while
Australian workers generate a good deal more output per hour than the average
of other developed countries.
The Royal Commission needs to be seen in the wider political and economic context. It also needs to be seen in the broader activities of the corporate sector – where corruption and bribery is in the millions of dollars every day - more on that later.
No comments:
Post a Comment