Nick G.
(Above: Assad supporters rally in the Syrian capital)
The
Syrian civil war, which began in early 2011, is now entering its third year. Imperialist
and reactionary Muslim hopes for an easy victory over the government of Bashar
Al-Assad have been dashed.
Consistent
with his opposition to imperialism and Israeli Zionism, Bashar Al-Assad has
stood firm in the face of insurgent forces variously armed, financed and
provided with personnel by the US-NATO bloc (including Turkey) on the one hand,
and the Saudi Arabian and Qatari regimes on the other.
Reflecting
the different agendas of these external sponsors, the so-called Free Syrian
Army lacks the unity and internal cohesion to deliver a decisive blow against
the Syrian government. Its lack of a
real base in the Syrian people, whose peaceful demonstrations for democratic
reforms and measures to counter social problems arising from certain
neo-liberal policies adopted in recent years by the government, leads it to use
terrorist violence and arbitrary killings and atrocities. This further
alienates the FSA from the people.
Hiding
under the fig-leaf of “concern for the Syrian people”, the real agenda of the
US-NATO bloc is to destroy Syrian independence so as to more fully exert
complete control over the Middle East. It is also a move on the chessboard
whose game focusses on the destruction of the anti-imperialist regime in Iran.
People’s
struggle good; imperialist interference bad.
Progressive
in its political opposition to imperialism, the Syrian government nevertheless
administers a capitalist economy, and contradictions between the rich and the
poor, exacerbated by sectional loyalties and religious factionalism, have never
been far below the surface.
Underscoring
the impetus that nationalisation of key industries can provide to a relatively
weak national economy, the Syrian economy expanded rapidly in the 1960s and
peaked in the 1970s. Over-reliant on oil and agriculture and lacking a strong
manufacturing sector, it declined for a time in the 1980s and then grew again
in the following decade.
However,
from 2000 onwards, and partly to appease the World Bank which began funding
various infrastructure projects, the Syrian government approved legislation for
a private banking system, promoted the role of the market in commerce and real
estate, promoted the influence of finance capital through the 2009 creation of
the Damascus stock exchange, and allowed other acts of economic neo-liberalism
which enriched a few in the private sector, but led to increases in the prices
of land and food and other services, thus impoverishing the majority.
It
was in this environment that struggles by the people broke out against the
government.
It
is the inalienable right of any people to rebel against reactionary authority,
but such struggles must remain under the leadership of the working class and
not be suborned by forces with an even more reactionary agenda.
Freedom
and independence are the essential preconditions for the development of the democratic
rights of the people. They can neither be imported nor exported, but must be
won by each people conducting its own difficult and protracted struggle.
Support
Syrian people’s struggles
Only
the people can provide assistance to each other’s struggles without seeking to
interfere, to bully or to control. Such is the essence of proletarian
internationalism. It stands in stark contrast to the “humanitarianism” of the
imperialists who write the word on their banners with the blood of the
innocent.
We
must take a more active stand in support of Syria’s independence and
freedom.
We
must reject NATO intervention and the deployment and use of Patriot missiles in
Turkey.
We
must explain to our own people the reactionary nature of the Free Syrian Army
and its various component factions.
We
must condemn Australian government support for the overthrow of the Bashar
Al-Assad regime and insist on an Australian foreign policy which respects the
independence and national sovereignty of other nations.
We
must have confidence in the ability of the Syrian people to determine their own
future in which a democratic, independent and secular state unites the
different religions and clans on the basis of freedom and equality.
We
leave the final word to a recent statement from the Syrian Communist Youth
Union (Khaled Bagdash Youth):
There can be no revolution
in concert with world imperialism. No
revolution with NATO. No revolution with the reactionary regimes of the
mercenary and treacherous rulers of the Gulf who steal the wealth of the people
of the Arab peninsula… Because a revolution whose first slogan is not the
liberation of the land in opposition to imperialism and Zionism is not a
revolution. A revolution which does not
raise the banner of national independence and prevent external intervention is
not a revolution.
We shall struggle against
the terrorist groups and imperialist death machines, for independence and
sovereignty, for the freedom of our homeland and for the good life of the
people.
Our battle is long and hard,
but we will progress along the path of honourable struggle and we’ll win.
No comments:
Post a Comment