Ned K.
(Above: SA Forestry workers protesting the earlier CCH forward rotation sale).
While city
newspapers and online news focussed this week on the meeting of Premiers and Prime
Minister, newspapers in the South East of SA carried a lead story on the
privatisation by the state government of the Limestone Coast's Forestry SA
operations to foreign owned interests.
OneFortyOne
Plantations is a consortium managed by US based private timber investment
company The Campbell Group.
Sixty
workers will lose their jobs with Forestry SA.
They will be offered jobs with the privatised owner but with no job
guarantee after 30 June 2018.
The
privatisation announcement was made without any formal consultation with the
timber workers' union, CFMEU .
Brad Coates
from the union is reported in The Border
Watch to say workers are concerned not only about their job security. They
are also concerned that the state government had handed over decades of timber
management intellectual property for basically nothing.
He said
union reps had just completed enterprise bargaining negotiations with Forestry
SA and nothing was said about the shock announcement this week about the
privatisation.
In 2012, the State Government sold up to
three forward rotations of timber harvests in the south-east to Carter Holt
Harvey (CCH) for 105 years, getting an up-front payment of $670 million.
As part of the 2012 deal, ForestrySA was to
manage the south-east plantations for five years until late 2017 and possibly
beyond.
The following year, Linda Sewell, a top CCH
executive moved to OneFortyOne Plantations as chief executive.
This latest
privatisation by stealth by the Labor Government in SA comes at a time when the
Labor Party is moving further away from unions under the guise of becoming more
inclusive and inviting for all Australians "in the national interest".
Does
privatisation of more assets, especially in the more vulnerable regional areas
of the nation, add or detract from the national interest?
With the
privatisation of timber workers jobs and forestry assets, where will the
profits from the business end up under the ownership of OneFort One
Plantations?
How will
selling intellectual property rights to a multinational forestry company
benefit 'the national interest'?
No comments:
Post a Comment