Max O.
(Above: Sydney rally protesting co-payments for visits to doctors and the end of bulk-billing).
As Medicare turns thirty years old, the corporate health
industry is closing in to decimate and swallow it up, with a little help from
the 'Audit Commission' and the Abbott Coalition government. It was established
by the Hawke Labor government back in 1984 as a government insurance fund,
financed partly by an income tax levy of 1.5%.
Whilst the ALP trumpets Medicare as their crowning
achievement, it never was a fully universal health care scheme. It replaced
Medibank, which was created by the Whitlam Labor government with a 1.35% levy
and then increased to 2.5% by the Fraser Coalition government. The current
scheme provides for treatment in public hospitals and 85% of GP fees, when doctors
do not bulk bill their patients. Dental care is not covered by Medicare.
Corporate lobbying
The so-called Australian Centre for Health Research (ACHR)
submitted to the Audit Commission the proposal that a $6 co-payment be
mandatory for visits to GPs who bulk-bill. This follows in the footsteps of the
Hawke Labor government which also attempted to bring in a Medicare co-payment
in 1991. The move was dropped because of a widespread backlash.
The ACHR also calls for a freeze on Medicare rebates paid
for basic GP visits for 4 years, which would kill off bulk-billing.
The ACHR was set up by the corporate health industry, which
includes the largest health insurance companies and pharmaceutical industries.
Guess who are some of the leading figures within the ACHR?
Well there's Terry Barnes, a former health adviser to Tony
Abbott, who wrote the ACHR's research paper that argued for the $6 co-payment
for bulk-billing GP visits. Then there's Neil Batt, ACHR's executive director
and a former ALP president and deputy premier of Tasmania .
Batt philosophises: "There's nothing in the Labor
tradition that says everyone, rich and poor, should get something for free.
Supporting policies like this would help Labor restore its economic credibility
with the electorate."
They claim over-servicing will be stopped by the co-payment
which will reduce visits and therefore the cost of Medicare rebates going to
doctors. This stance is reinforced by Peter Dutton, Minister for Health who
whines, "It's hard to understand where we are going to find money to pay
for these services."
A super profits tax on mining corporations and banks would
be a good place to start collecting money!
No doubt the co-payment would reduce the number of patients
visiting their GPs - such as the chronically ill, the poor and pensioners.
However the reduction of early intervention via
GP visits would more than likely see a huge increase in costly
hospitalisation of patients.
Take over of
The co-payment and a freeze on Medicare rebates for GPs is
the foot in the door for the health insurance companies to eventually take over
the primary care offered by GPs. Once they have demolished bulk-billing this
will open the way to start gap insurance for GP visits and specialist services.
No doubt there will be open slather for health fees to then sky rocket.
Once these changes take place the health insurance industry
and the big private hospitals can start running totally
They will choose the GP you will see, which hospital you can
go to and so on. Eventually a corporate controlled health system will
inevitably see costs escalate and patient care based on what they can afford.
The rich will have high quality care because they can afford high cost health
insurance and the medium to low income patients will receive cursory care,
because that is all they can afford.
Another method of reducing health costs being contemplated
by the Audit Commission is to privatise management of public hospitals. This
recommendation comes from the Centre for Independent Studies, a right wing
policy making institute. The attempt here is to profit from further lowering
staffing costs and increase working hours.
What should be done away with is the 30 to 40% private
health insurance rebate, which costs the government $6 billion. This is in
effect money transferred from the public hospitals to bolster private hospitals
and line the pockets of the health insurance companies.
In a decent society health services would be free to all.
The important needs of life - health, education, housing, transport, and
employment should be guaranteed as part of our rights and liberties! Under
capitalism these are not considered a right but a privilege that should be paid
for.
The current capitalist stagnation is requiring governments to roll back state backed health services. Capital, once more, is on the offensive against these needs of life, via the austerity policies about to be implemented by the Coalition government.
The important needs of life - health, education, housing, transport, and employment would be guaranteed by a decent society. Capitalism is only interested in providing these services as a commodity for profit.
The task of Socialism is to involve the population in the planning and distribution of these services so that they meet peoples' needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment